Talk:Alberta New Democratic Party
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alberta New Democratic Party article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Untitled
To michaelm: As I said before, it's not necessary to have *both* the soc-dem and dem-soc links in the introducation, given that the terms are more-or-less interchangeable in the Canadian context. (Note also: there *is* a dem-soc wikilink further down the page.) CJCurrie 17:01, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Planning to make stark changes to this page
As it is, the page is almost unreadable. It took me a while to figure out what this group's philosophy was. I think a lot of the issues of the page could be addressed with some decisive edits. Rajvansh Upadhyay (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- You appear to be a new editor. No problem, but please make sure you familiarise yourself with WP:5P before you kick off a major rewrite. In particular, WP:CITE and WP:RS, along with WP:NPOV, are going to be absolutely critical to your success. These are tricky policies, even for well-established editors. You are, of course, welcome to make changes. If you find yourself getting reverted, please stop, take a step back, and come here to establish consensus for your changes. You might not be able to do that, in which case you should refrain from reintroducing your content. Editing Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. I hope your earlier comment here no longer reflects your approach to editing. --Yamla (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Multiple issues??
This article has had a "multiple issues" notice, referencing both "tone" and "more citations needed" problems, since 2016. I question whether these issues still apply to the article in its current state. Comments? — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Why is Alberta NDP labeled more left wing then BC NDP?
BCNDP is labelled as center-left but ANDP is labelled as center-left to left, but in reality BCNDP is much further to the right of Alberta NDP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousioss (talk • contribs) 18:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class socialism articles
- Low-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Mid-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Alberta articles
- Mid-importance Alberta articles
- Start-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- Mid-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- Start-Class political party articles
- Mid-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English