Talk:Taishan Nuclear Power Plant

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

June 14 news a scam ?

The French are asking technical help from US and lament a Chinese cover-up ? --Robertiki (talk) 23:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are now more sources. --Robertiki (talk) 02:18, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"No radioactive gases have been released to the environment and the EPR reactor design used in Taishan is considered to be one of the safest in use."

Who added this sentence to the article?:

No radioactive gases have been released to the environment and the EPR reactor design used in Taishan is considered to be one of the safest in use.

This is obviously false, as the June 8, 2021 memo specifically stated that the amount of radioactive gases released to the atmosphere from the Taishan Nuclear Power Plant had already exceeded French safety standards. Please don't undermine our project's credibility by inserting inaccurate information into this article, or allowing it to remain. That's just unacceptable. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]