Talk:Tidal Basin

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Lakes

	Lakes portal Tidal Basin is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wilbur Mills?

How the Tidal Basin article be complete without a mention of the late Wilbur Mills or Fanne Fox? Mills Admits Being Present During Tidal Basin Scuffle Fnorth 02:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a DC tour guide, I think it is appropriate to keep the Tidal Basin on a separate page from West Potomac Park (with appropriate cross references). Basically, people know, use and will search the term Tidal Basin. Very few, outside of the National Park Service, know the label West Potomac Park. GCappy 15:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get why this Mills story is so important as to deserve half the space of the full article. Not having heard the story before, I'm hoping this synopsis is a less interesting version than whatever legend/mystique there is with the version that tour guides give. As it is now, it just sounds like it belongs on a page about Mills himself as it seems to have very little to do with the Tidal Basin. Is it necessary to keep this here? Wilhelmp (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tidal basin

Err.. this is not what i expected to find. I thought a tidal basin was generally an inlet of water from a river or something similar. This article should be renamed as it is confusing with the more common usage. Simply south 20:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...but that is the universally accepted name of the feature under discussion.... PurpleChez (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tidal Basin (District of Columbia) → Tidal Basin – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC) unnecessary disambiguation; should be moved back to original name. No other article needs the title and Tidal Basin already redirects here anyway. Station1 (talk) 06:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Superfluous disambiguation. Jenks24 (talk) 11:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose per above and this. In fact I think a separate article should be created on the feature. It is somewhat similar to an estuary or creek. Simply south...... creating lakes for 5 years 12:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but we don't preemptively disambiguate. Jenks24 (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose per Simply South. I agree that a separate article is needed. —Diiscool (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Write the article, then revisit the issue (although note User:Station1's comment below). — AjaxSmack 01:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose it should be the meaning of this. Can someone repoint it to the article containing that subject? (I assume that an existing article covers it as a subtopic. If not, a new article should be created). 70.24.247.40 (talk) 04:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by nom. Even if a new article were created (volunteers?), it would be at Tidal basin, not Tidal Basin, and all we'd have to do is add a hatnote to this article per WP:PRECISION. Station1 (talk) 04:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Disambiguation not needed. — AjaxSmack 01:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. Powers ^T 23:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Tidal Basin is clear. Glrx (talk) 22:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MLK Stone of Hope.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:MLK Stone of Hope.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tidal Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

maps

May I humbly suggest some maps... at the very least, a "before" and "after" pair, showing the changes made by the construction of the Tidal Basin. PurpleChez (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]