Talk:Biology 101

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move?

Why not publish this at "Biology 101"? There's no article there, so therefore no need to have the "(Community)" distinction tacked on. Kevinbrogers (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review section beautifully written.

"Biology 101" received positive reviews from critics." I have never read a section with such crisp detail and writing in my life. Whoever wrote this is one of the greatest writers in the history of literature. No, but seriously, expand the damn section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.88.97.42 (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel this strongly about it, feel free to do it yourself. Kevinbrogers (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biology 101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110925174447/http://www.nbc.com:80/community/episode-guide/season-3/401501/biology-101/episode-301/401502 to http://www.nbc.com/community/episode-guide/season-3/401501/biology-101/episode-301/401502/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]