Jump to content

Talk:Solon Borglum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 00:33, 12 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WPBiography}}, {{ChristianityWikiProject}}, {{WikiProject Smithsonian Institution}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Free image

[edit]

A free image of him can be found here /Lokal_Profil 23:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated quality rating

[edit]

This article has been expanded and improved and is not a stub; I have assigned it a B class since citations and writing quality are generally good.--Sarasays (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of irrelevant and unsourced information

[edit]

An editor keeps attempting to add to the article that Borglum's teacher in Omaha, J. Laurie Wallace was "the principal figure in Eakins' 'The Swimming Hole', now at the Amon Carter Museum." It is my contention that (1) this is unsourced and (2) it is irrelevant to an article about Borglum that his teacher appeared in another artist's painting. It tells us nothing relevant about Wallace as a teacher, or about what Borglum might have learned from them. It is, in fact, a piece of unrelated interjected trivia which the editor needs to stop trying to force into the article. BMK (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor:
The proposition is simple. The connection to someone as august as Eakins is J. Laurie Wallace. J. Laurie Wallace was far more than a simple 'former pupil of Thomas Eakins'. He was a consummate model (to Eakins), assistant instructor and important in Eakins' development of locomotion in film, carried on by Muybridge. This fleshes out the attraction to Wallace by Borglum and gives an importance to why Borglum would have sought out Wallace in a town such as Omaha. It is not a BAD thing that knowledge beyond the simple sentence structure would be gained by stating Wallace's importance. Wallace's Wikipedia page is ALL about Eakins. None of Wallace's own artwork is illustrated, which will be remedied. Also Borglum's page, considering his towering accomplishments in sculpture is extraordinarily tiny. And that will be remedied. This entry about Wallace EXPANDS the knowledge delivered about Borglum. That is good.
Mountain Out of a Molehill:
You have spent an inordinate amount of time on something that is trivial (your expulsion of the information), time that could and should be spent on something far more important. If you delete any of this you will be reported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdillonf (talkcontribs) 03:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bullshit. You are edit warring, you have no consensus, and your going down. BMK (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Solon Borglum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]