Jump to content

Talk:Chicago White Sox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 19:18, 12 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Chicago}}, {{WikiProject Baseball}}, {{WikiProject Illinois}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Alternate shirts, 2010 season

It seems like they have been wearing their alternate shirts a lot more often this year than either their home or away shirts. Anybody know why? Tad Lincoln (talk) 01:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why they've done that this year. It begs the question whether black road pants are far behind!--Factchk (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason was that under Ozzie Guillen the starting pitcher got to select the jersey. You'll notice that Mark Buehrle always picked the black, and I believe Danks as well. I think that is over now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.66.236 (talk) 19:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality of Players

Main page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball § Nationality of Players

Given the fact that baseball is becoming an increasingly more international sport (i.e., more non-U.S. leagues in existence, more non-U.S. players in the MLB), the roster formatting on Wikipedia should probably be updated to reflect that. If you look at the formatting for other international sports (such as soccer), the player nationalities are indicated using flag icons. I think this would be a beneficial update to each of the major league rosters in the MLB, it would not be too difficult to implement and it would not clutter the information on the page. However, before such change a change is implemented, I thought it would be healthy to achieve at least some form of consensus on the talk page for each team. yuristache (talk) 01:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Western League

Do any other teams have Western League pennants listed in the infoboxes? It seems kind of out of place. And if it's going to be there, it should at least be accurate. According to the article, Western League (original), the White Stockings won the Western League pennant in 1900, as well. Tad Lincoln (talk) 03:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Western League was a minor league; it did not become major until Ban Johnson reorganized it. So, those pennants shouldn't be listed in the infobox, only leagues considered "major" should be listed there. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In 1900, it was called the American League, but was still a minor league; the Sox won the pennant; it broke with the establishment in 1901 and declared itself major; and the Sox won the pennant that year too. Whether those pre-1901 championships should be listed is questionable. Maybe this is a question for the baseball project page? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 05:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Style of English and date formats

Since the article is about an American professional baseball (MLB) team, it seems that the preferred style of English should be American English per MOS:TIES. This should also apply to dates as well per MOS:DATETIES and MOS:DATEUNIFY. So, I was bold and added Template:Use mdy dates and Template:Use American English to the top of the article along with a hidden note referencing this talk page post. I'm pretty sure that's not something that should be controversial, but I'm happy to discuss if others feel differently. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 08:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retiring of Konerko's number

I'm not sure why the sentence "Paul Konerko's number 14 was retired prior to the game against the Minnesota Twins on May 23, 2015." needs to be removed from the article. The statement is supported by a reliable source so it can be verified. The only reason given each time it has been removed by Megacheez (see [1], [2], and [3]) is that "This event occurred earlier this season". I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean because most of the things the article describes have already occurred. If the wording of the sentence is a problem that can be fixed, but it seems that a source is needed somewhere to show when Kornerko's number was retired, right? I'm not interested in engaging in any edit warring. I`m just trying to understand what's wrong the sentence about Konerko. If text is not needed, the perhaps the source should at least be added to the date his number was retired in the {{retired number list}}. Shouldn't the retiring of a player's number be something that is supported by a reliable source somewhere within the article. - Marchjuly (talk) 06:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minor issue question

Should it be "The Chicago White Sox are..." (current construction) or "The Chicago White Sox is..."? It's one team, so is the singular verb correct?--Daveler16 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicago White Sox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chicago White Sox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicago White Sox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo & Cap Insignia

Is there a way we can add to the MLB info box parameters to include an option for both “Logo & Cap Insignia” as one since the White Sox are the only MLB team where they’re one in the same? I realize every other team has a separate logo and cap Insignia but for the WS exclusively it makes sense. Banan14kab (talk) 20:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chicago_White_Sox&oldid=1206652972"