Jump to content

Talk:List of countries by public sector size

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 05:12, 13 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Economics}}, {{WikiProject Countries}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WPLibertarianism}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled

[edit]

I have corrected the data provided from my publication. The previous source used was Table 7, covering only employment of nationals: the new data are from Table 9, which is for total employment. Martin Baldwin-Edwards.

china's public sector size

[edit]

according to this source http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-government-sector-employment-2011-11 almost 50% of employment is in the public sector.

including it's many super size public corporations.

and it does seem more logical than the 30% or so that the other source in the article presents. i mean, after all the chinse government controls most of heavy industry right?Adrian234567 (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC) I'll include itHolden3172 (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Holden3172[reply]

Problem with ILO citation

[edit]

The citation from the ILO worked fine a few months ago, but now, it takes me to a website in which I am prompted to enter a username and password. Clearly something is not right,Holden3172 (talk) 07:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Holden3172[reply]

Number doesn't match

[edit]

The number for Brazil doesn't match the reference. On the OCED publication, it seems to be around 13%. Hrimhariw (talk) 04:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what is the reference for Brazil's ILO figure? Links 7 and 8 are broken. ILO data (see here https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer8/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=PSE_TPSE_GOV_NB_A) is from 2009 and does not adds up to 20%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:4003:3710:7D43:64D0:72E2:40A (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect OECD figures

[edit]

Numbers are wrong. Consult https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=78408# and look at indicator: Employment in general government as a percentage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.53.75 (talk) 17:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also OECD publication 'Employment in the public sector' https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/gov_glance-2015-22-en.pdf?expires=1530207182&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=B821B4055EFBD4C11EA4E96206C5AF66 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.53.75 (talk) 17:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea

[edit]

What about North Korea? Should be near 90% Chelentano (talk) 04:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]