Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfredo Mario Espósito Castro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 03:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alfredo Mario Espósito Castro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92^Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In general we have kept Catholic bishops (and bishops of other major denominations). There is huge precedent and consensus for this. See WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clergyoutcomes is NOT a notability guideline. Even if it says bishops are often kept, it does NOT say they are exempt from notability requirements, and doing nothing but referencing that is a circular argument. That's a bad precedent if there's not actually significant coverage on the topic. If little can be said except that he was bishop, it should be redirected to Roman Catholic Diocese of Zárate-Campana. Reywas92^Talk 13:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What it does is illustrate consensus, one of the concepts upon which Wikipedia is founded. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found a large number of articles in one newspaper alone. The reason WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES exists for Catholic bishops is that they are pretty reliably covered extensively once you dig into it, although those sources may not all be available online. Jahaza (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jahaza. I think we can be fairly confident that sources exist that might just not be online. I had a search with a few Spanish words I guessed might be associated, and found 1, 2 discussions, passing mentions 3, 4, and more-than-passing-mention 5. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 03:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.