Talk:Federalist No. 45
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Historical Implications section strikes me as pretty opinionated. The initial quote is from a NY Times Opinion piece, which is a troubling start, and later experiences with states nullifying Federal drug law and immigration policy argue against its conclusion. The following statement that "The 10th Amendment… has preserved the powers of the federal and state governments until present day since 1791," is completely unsupported by the source given, and would be hard to definitively justify in any case. The whole section seems motivated by an urge to provide a conclusion, and I think the article would be more appropriate if the section were simply removed rather than rewritten. Jason Fruit (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Mid-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- Start-Class United States History articles
- Unknown-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles