This template is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
I tend to agree with your edit and point. I think it kinda started out as pretty monumntal type sites when created by another editor, but as it expanded, and more sites were added for their importance not so much for their monumentality, guess you get the picture. Good change. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2015
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Most of the terms we use for pre-Columbian regions and cultures are anachronistic. If we eliminated "North America" in the article, what would we call the region. The article is divided into a list of regions, "Southeastern", "Northeastern", etc. whose names are just as anachronistic as "North America". What would you suggest we use as a replacement for those terms? It is generally only when we get to the level of tribes, chiefdoms, or towns, that we have an inkling of what the people called themselves, often depending on how much we trust European transcriptions of names. - Donald Albury00:03, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Edited 00:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How many sites?
I have just added some pre-Columbian sites to the list, and realized how many more are not yet listed. How many items in the list are too many? Do we want to restrict what gets added to the list? I did add List of shell ring sites, which lists over 70 pre-Columbian sites (not the counting a dozen or so sites in Japan), 20 or 30 of which have articles, so none of those need to be added here. We could perhaps just link to "Category:Archaeological sites in ..." for countries or sub-divisions of countries in North America. Any ideas? Donald Albury14:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]