Wikipedia:Featured article review/Trapped in the Closet (South Park)/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by FACBot (talk | contribs) at 12:15, 15 February 2024 (Archiving 'Trapped in the Closet (South Park)'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot (talk) 7:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [1].
Review section
[edit]Nominating for FAR per notes on the talk page, primarily comprehensiveness and organization; minor issues are with referencing and images. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 00:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The most obvious issues to me are:
- Lead is too long, especially the second paragraph
- Plot summary exceeds 400 words (MOS:TVPLOT)
- Excessively long quotes
- Legacy section is mostly sourced to primary sources and could be cut (aside from Emmys part)
- Basically all stuff that was already noted. I'll try to shorten the lead and plot section but the controversies probably need a more thorough pruning. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I reviewed the images. I amended the rationale for the infobox, and I believe that the second image (the ad in Variety) is salvageable under WP:NFC#CS, because there is sourced commentary about the image (note the text says it was interpreted as a sneaky allusion to Mel Gibson, instead of being the congratulations that Variety intended that ad to be.
- I agree that the third image isn't worthy of inclusion because it's simply illustrative, so I removed it.
- I cannot comment on proper organisation or comprehensiveness because I'm not too familiar with the subject of the article. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC. While some progress was made shortly after it was nominated, the concerns about the balance and reception sections have not had enough attention. Z1720 (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per above. Hog Farm Talk 13:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include comprehensiveness and structure. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no progress to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist definitely below FA quality. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above, further work needed. Hog Farm Talk 04:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.