Talk:Idalium
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this information correct???
I know it is from Britannica, but I just visited Idalion (sic) and the information I have is that it dates from considerably earlier than this. See
http://www.assyriatimes.com/engine/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3084
for the 2005 results. The Dorling Kindersley guide to Cyprus also has some information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 51kwad (talk • contribs) 12:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Rename to Idalion?
I reversed the order (Greek first) in the lede, and all the sources we quote or cite use "Idalion". I presume "Idalium" is the Latin version, but is there any reason for the article to be named that? Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- Start-Class Cypriot articles
- Mid-importance Cypriot articles
- All WikiProject Cyprus pages
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Phoenicia articles
- Low-importance Phoenicia articles
- WikiProject Phoenicia articles