Jump to content

Talk:Jungle division

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:40, 15 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Australia}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

[edit]

G'day, I have the following comments/suggestions for improvement;

  • structure: there is one main heading, I wonder if this could be broken up a bit more;
  • this source has some good info: Organising for jungle warfare, pp 86-101
  • I wonder if more context couldn't be added by talking about the early divisional establishment and the focus of the Army's early campaigns being in the desert, then discuss the shift towards the Pacific as the main theatre of Army operations...?
  • inconsistent terminology: CMF and Militia. I suggest using Militia, as it wasn't technically the CMF until 1948 (I believe);
  • more could possibly be said about the need for flexibility: some areas allowed more equipment than others (the Organising for jungle warfare chapter I've linked to above mentions this);
  • I wonder if something could be added about whether or not the Army kept the jungle division after the war. (They didn't, but you could mention it - see p 101 of Palazzo "Organising for jungle warfare"). Additionally maybe a mention of the parallels to Australian forces committed to the region later might be made (p. 95 Organising for jungle warfare). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jungle division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]