Jump to content

Talk:K.Flay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:59, 15 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject California}}, {{WikiProject Chicago}}, {{WikiProject Hip hop}}, {{WikiProject Illinois}}, {{WikiProject Women in Music}}, {{WikiProject Women in hip hop music}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Proposal to rework

[edit]

I'd be glad to work on her Wikipedia article if only it would not get deleted; thanks for preserving this copy. KingAlanI (talk) 09:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking recently at the citations and I think there's probably enough sourcing to support this article. Depending on what's dredged up I would think there's a much better chance of being sustained. Ronnotel (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent; I'll expand upon the version you posted shortly - I hope. :) Working on it in a word processor first (as I often do with my online posts); should I just copy/paste it into K.Flay when I have a draft done? KingAlanI (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just posted it to K.Flay. KingAlanI (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what do you think about it being targeted for speedy deletion? I'm confident it's a notable subject, but I'm not sure how to phrase a rationale succinctly.KingAlanI (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will re-do this eventually - hopefully. :) KingAlanI (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's WP:NODEADLINE. Peace. Ronnotel (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sauces

[edit]

http://www.billboard.com/column/the-juice/k-flay-talks-new-music-touring-being-inspired-1006774752.story http://www.spinner.com/2010/03/15/k-flay-interview-sxsw-2010/ http://www.sfexaminer.com/entertainment/music/2012/01/stanford-dare-inspired-kflay-channel-her-anger-music http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-11-23/entertainment/ct-ott-1125-k-flay-20111123_1_bay-area-rap-kflay-standardized-tests

Slather liberally on article to prevent future deletion. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Track Listing / Album Detail Section

[edit]

K.Flay's albums probably don't meet the notability guidelines to be their own articles, and so I propose that we add a new section for track listings and album details on the main page. Comments? Zanfar (talk) 17:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure about that. Just work up an article and see if we can defend it. I think today's debut is smashing and will get needed notoriety this month in Pitchforks and other spoons... --Mareklug talk 00:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Why isn't this at K.Flay without a space, to look like the album cover?"

[edit]

Just to pre-emptively head off the otherwise inevitable requested move: See MOS:TM and WP:COMMONNAME. Wikipedia does not mimic logo stylizations, including those that play around with letter spacing, character substitutions, case changes, etc. An exception can be made in the rare case that the mainstream press (i.e. reliable sources, written like Wikipedia for a general audience) very consistently prefer the stylized variant. Some examples are iPhone and Deadmau5, which virtually no one ever writes as "IPhone" (except at the beginning of a sentence) or "Iphone", or as "Deadmaus", respectively.

K. Flay does not rise to that level of consistent treatment, as can be verified in seconds with a Google News search [1]. Major newspapers clearly prefer the space, while music fandom bloggers prefer to imitate the logo. Local newspapers, which are of only middling reliability quality and low editorial control, are divided. Music-industry publications tend to imitate the logo, but they are not independent sources on a matter like this; the vast majority of their revenue comes from record label advertising, so they have direct monetary incentive to do what the industry marketers want (you'll also see this in other ways, e.g. their imitation of substandard capitalization practices to match album and single cover art, and, back in the day, many also replaced Prince's name with the made-up symbol he was using for a while).  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  23:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAN POV?

[edit]

This article states it seems to be written from a fans POV. It has been completely rewritten to try to change the tone. Can you offer suggestions on what sounds "Fan written" or on how we can improve it to give it a more "encyclopedia tone"? EmvCS (talk) 17:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on K.Flay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]