Talk:Labour power

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criticism of the concept of labour power

Frankly, this section is miserably poor. I am sure that classical economists have made better critiques of Marx's concepts than merely accusing him of lack of originality, of vagueness, etc.

Hasn't Boehm-Bawerk made a thoroug critique of Das Kapital? Perhaps that should be used, instead of van der Linden's tautologies? Ninguém (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of references

One reference for the entire article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 19:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Still a lack of references. «Labour power … is a key concept used by Karl Marx…». Marxism demands new developments in a changing world, based on Marxist concepts. But Wikipedia in not the place for personal research (Wikipedia:No original research). The parts about the theory of Marx himself need more references. Many very long developments in the page are modern without any reference. This is a difficult situation. I do not feel allowed to suppress 4/5 of the page, contents that exist since quite a long time. Part of it is interesting. It is up to the authors to provide references or to cut their OR. --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 08:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remark: The above user has now brought this issue to WP:ORN. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labour power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928000758/http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=04%2F11%2F02%2F1744204&mode=nested&ti to http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=04%2F11%2F02%2F1744204&mode=nested&ti

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]