Talk:Languages of Egypt
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]- Please, take care of this article, as it's subjected to continuous vandalism. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Languages of Egypt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927072656/http://www.arc-news.com/read.php?lang=en&id_articol=1059 to http://www.arc-news.com/read.php?lang=en&id_articol=1059
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Languages of Egypt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927184643/http://www.panafril10n.org/wikidoc/pmwiki.php/PanAfrLoc/Egypt to http://www.panafril10n.org/wikidoc/pmwiki.php/PanAfrLoc/Egypt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Indigenous
[edit]Dear Ehartz01, the word "indigenous" is anthropologically inappropriate, because the majority of Egypt's population didn't recently migrate, outnumbering the original population, like in the Americas and Australasia. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Mahmudmasri,
- Thank you for your feedback. I don't believe the word "indigenous" necessitates the implication that it is used by a minority, or the presence of a "non-indigenous" majority, or whether that presence is a majority at all. It can simply mean originally from the land where they currently are found, regardless of the presence or non-presence of others. What constitutes "recent" migration is also up for debate. I believe "indigenous" was more appropriate a label than "other," quite literally otherizing the speakers of those languages. The current framing of the article listing them as "minority" languages is perhaps better and more politically neutral. Ehartz01 (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC)