Jump to content

Talk:Catherine McBride

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 11:42, 19 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Linguistics}}, {{WikiProject Women scientists}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comment

[edit]

Catherine Bride-McChang is a serious contributer to current educational research in the field of early literacy.


See my comments in the email. develo some thematic information about her research practices and products —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.78.21.145 (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5/7/09 Added an internal link from and to the article on orthography. Listed McBride-Chang in the See Also section of Orthography article. That orthography article could use some help in the area of cross-cultural orthography development (hint-hint to original creator of McBride-Change article!).JourneyWomanSLP (talk) 03:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.psy.cuhk.edu.hk/index.php/en/people/teaching-staff/11-people/143-mcbride-chang-catherine-alexandra. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 07:08, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

I'm not sure that she meets WP:PROF, but I have never been very good at judging criteria number one. What do other people think? — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 07:07, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]