Jump to content

Talk:Rantala incident

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 15:51, 19 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled

[edit]

Finnish nickname "Peltimikko" has earlier as well delivered false information about Bäckman. Here he continued to deliver false information. It would be good if somebody else, more thrustworthy individuals, would edit this article. --91.152.84.165 (talk) 20:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article have two primary sources: Kommersant's article: "Bronze Boy" [1] (in Russian). The article does not give very flattering picture of Johan Bäckman's operations. And Helsingin Sanomat's article: "The incident was internal politics of Russia" [2] (in Finnish). Both articles are analytical. Peltimikko (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very typical for "Peltimikko" to choose the only article which gives false information about Bäckman. There is no evidence of "changing" the story. Kommersant opinion article is not enough here. Helsingin Sanomat is notoriously anti-Russian propaganda. One should take local press as well, such as Turun Sanomat, which wrote much more, or the local newspaper Kulmakunta (www kulmis fi), which wrote about the incident. --91.152.84.165 (talk) 06:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting that "Peltimikko" choose the only critical article from Kommersant because it did not give "flattering" image for Bäckman. Note that Peltimikko is actively editing articles with anti-Russian and revanchist attitudes. Wikipedia is not for people like Peltimikko, who carry out their on nationalistic propaganda here. Peltimikko should be excluded. --91.152.84.165 (talk) 06:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting that "Peltimikko" has chosen a couple of biased Finnish articles on the issue and the only "critical" Russian article, while he ignores thousands of Russian articles. The main source of the incident were the parents, who talked to Russian media. Any media would not believe a single commentator such as Bäckman who is not the primary source. --91.152.84.165 (talk) 08:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added as a source an interesting article by YLE [3].According to the article "This was a serious collision of cultures. The Finnish authorities believed that deal with child protection cases, while ... the Kremlin's representative made a high international politics." Peltimikko (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]