Talk:Robot Building

Robot Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 22, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 30, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the United Overseas Bank's 20-story Bangkok headquarters (pictured) is shaped like a robot?

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Puff piece

This article is obviously a promotional piece. Sumet Jumsai's buildings are on the whole impractical, dismal, standard high-risers with an 'amusing' skin, and invariably badly executed. Needs to be flagged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sartoresartus (talk • contribs) 14:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Seeing no obvious variance from the good article criteria; i.e. the article is well written, well referenced, stable, broad, and NPOV, I have passed this article and listed it as a good article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayron32 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]