This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Are there any reasons to keep this section as in China since, from what I can see, it only handles Tibet. Thus I would consider renaming the section to In Tibet. Nirmaz (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In this article, I had realized that the page references a page that may not yet be in existence at the current moment. But I also recall another page known as "Batang, Sichuan". I would like to know if the township referenced is the same as the town in Batang, Sichuan.
IntellectuallyOlder(Alt. Account) (talk) 22:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]