Talk:Vijećnica
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Vijecnica was copied or moved into Vijećnica with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editing this page
[edit]There's quite a lot to be done to this page: additions, tidying up the English etc. I'm willing to make a start on that in the next few days, will do so unless this page gets filled with people screaming 'no, no, don't do that'. The Old Trout (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Please Help!
[edit]The article does not differentiate between the building and the establishment which was in it at a point in time. The National Library is now located at Zmaja od Bosne Street 8b. The building is named Vijećnica. Please rename it to Vijećnica. This error is causing major trouble on Google Maps; users are constantly trying to reopen it, even though the library is now at a new location.
The article needs to be renamed. The first sentence needs to get corrected. The Infobox as well.
Please help to fix this.Konspiratori (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:BOLD if you see something wrong with the page, and you can edit it, which it appears you can as the page is not subject to any protection, you should fix it in accordance with the way you think it should be changed. Everymorning (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you rename the article to Vijećnica? It seems I cannot. I would correct from that point on. Everymorning Thank you Konspiratori (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 09 September 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. The nominator makes a good argument that the proposed title most accurately reflects the scope of the article. Note that the old history at the target title was moved to Vijecnica in order to preserve it for attribution purposes. Jenks24 (talk) 17:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina → Vijećnica – The article is talking about the Building called Vijećnica; The National Library was just one of the establishments that were housed within Vijećnica; The national Library is for 20 years at a new location – Sewerload (talk) 17:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 09:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Sewerload:This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Shouldn't the title be Sarajevo City Hall? Vijećnica simply means "hall" and seems to be a local contraction of/nickname for Gradska vijećnica or "city hall", a term applied to a lot of city halls in Serbo-Croatian/Bosnian, e.g. sh:Gradska vijećnica u Šibeniku, hr:Stara gradska vijećnica u Zagrebu, bs:Gradska vijećnica Umeå, sr:Градска већница у Умеу. What about sources? Some of the article's sources use "City Hall". — AjaxSmack 13:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The City Hall is not housed in the building anymore. The National Library is not housed in the building anymore. The building is now a national monument/building: http://kons.gov.ba/main.php?id_struct=6&lang=1&action=view&id=2860 "Istorijska građevina – Gradska vijećnica u Sarajevu proglašava se nacionalnim spomenikom Bosne i Hercegovine". People pay a fee to see the interior. Vijećnica is the most common and recognized name for this building. Gradska vijećnica is more formal. But Gradska vijećnica in Sarajevo is a descriptive name. Just please remove the totally wrong name of this article.@ AjaxSmack Sewerload (talk) 18:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Rewriting
[edit]Some reworking is necessary - the lead in suggests the building was closed between the late 19th century and 2014, and the end section of the text is in the future tense. Jackiespeel (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vijećnica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110910143821/http://www.visitsarajevo.ba:80/sightseeing/attractions/historical-sarajevo/vijecnica-city-hall/ to http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/sightseeing/attractions/historical-sarajevo/vijecnica-city-hall/
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140511000936/http://www.oslobodjenje.ba:80/vijesti/sarajevo/obustava-saobracaja-povodom-otvaranja-vijecnice to http://www.oslobodjenje.ba/vijesti/sarajevo/obustava-saobracaja-povodom-otvaranja-vijecnice
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.sarajevo-x.com/bih/sarajevo/clanak/110906048/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)