Jump to content

Talk:Watatsumi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:47, 28 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Japan}}, {{WikiProject Cryptozoology}}, {{WikiProject Mythology}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Move

[edit]

I've moved this "Watatsumi Sanjin" "3 Watatsumi" to "Watatsumi" following the name used in the corresponding German, Italian, and Japanese articles. Keahapana (talk) 01:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge, as there is no cited evidence to suggest they are the same deity.

The both article say that Ryūjin and Watatsumi (Ōwatatsumi) are synonyms then why have two articles?--Redtigerxyz Talk 16:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding a rationale to the talk page per Help:MergingPrburley (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. You could be correct. However, these articles lack both in-line citations and citations from Japanese-language sources. Lacking those, I'm not in favor of a merge. Prburley (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. The nature of the discussion is totally different between these articles. There is a difference between nature deities from ancient times and story based deities which were used to help define a social structure and the power of the ruling class. Merging these articles, even though there has been a historical blurring of these deities, would destroy the major differences between them. I think a merger is a destructive idea. TMyers (talk) 20:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.244.240.218 (talk) [reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This article is formatted weirdly

[edit]

Most articles like this don't cite sources like this nor do they write separate sections like this.CycoMa (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]