Which image should be used for the infobox? Note that the images are not shown here due to free use restrictions preventing most of them being used on talk pages.
Can the article introduction about "Sri Lankan Tamils" also include another name "Eelam Tamils" that is used among themselves and in the wider Tamil-speaking world? Petextrodon (talk) 19:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Should the article about Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan describe, in its lead section and at least one paragraph of the rest of the article, sportswashing accusations against the article subject? Should it specifically contain the content added in [1]? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
In Julian Assange#Iraq and Afghan War logs, in relation to whether the names of Afghani informants should be redacted prior to the publication of the logs, should the allegation that Assange said the following be included?
Well, they’re informants, so if they get killed, they’ve got it coming to them. They deserve it.
Where articles on micronations use an infobox, should they use
A. infobox country (with the micronation parameter)
B. a custom infobox with the parameters type, proponents, dates claimed, and location; and image options limited to images of the country and/or its geographic location on a map
C. a different custom infobox
If C, please specify which parameters should be included. JoelleJay (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Roblox may be popular, but it wasn't popular when it was first released. It didn't reach peak popularity until the late 2010s. Does it belong here? 35.141.142.199 (talk) 02:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
What qualifiers should be used in the second sentence of the lead paragraph (which discusses the temple's relation to Ram Janmabhoomi)?
one or both options can be selected:
A. Many Hindus believe/according to Hindu beliefs, etc.
B. "the mythical birthplace of Rama" or alternatives, such as reputed, alleged, supposed etc.
How should the game's story and writing be described in tbe lead?
The game's story, particularly its conclusion of narrative arcs established in previous Batman: Arkham games related to Batman, was controversial and received significant backlash online. or a similar sentence.
...There has been praise given towards the game's writing... or "there has been praise given".
Mention reactions to the story, writing, and conclusion of character arcs established in previous installments in the lead, but wording used should be dissimilar to both Option #1 or Option #2.
Do not mention reaction to the story, writing, or conclusion of character arcs in the lead paragraphs for now.
Which option best represents Wikipedia policy and the current consensus of reviews/reactions? ShirtNShoesPls (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
The words Black Irish have been used, at different times and places, to describe:
Irish people with "white" skin and dark hair (as contrasted with the red-headed stereotype of Celtic people), such as Richard Nixon and Joan Jett. The description was also sometimes used for people with a similar appearance, e.g., Elizabeth Taylor[2][3] (who was not Irish).
Irish people with "black" skin (e.g., immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa and their descendants), such as Ifrah Ahmed, Kwaku Fortune, and Adam Idah.
The first group (e.g., black hair, blue eyes, pale skin) is the subject of this article. At some times and in some places, this first group's appearance has been (incorrectly) explained with a story about Spanish sailors being shipwrecked in Ireland. This story is not true, and is fairly described as a myth.
An editor would like to have this article begin with the words "The historic term Black Irish was a myth..." Other editors would like the article to begin with words like "The Black Irish were people of Irish ancestry, having dark hair..." or "Black Irish is a common description of the appearance of white Irish people with dark hair...", and introduce the origin myth after the group of people has been identified.
Question: Should the first sentence of this article describe the Black Irish as a myth, or as people?
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
