Talk:Carfilzomib
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Carfilzomib.
|
Suggested updates to carfilzomib page.
[edit]My name is Adam Silverstein. I am with WCG, a public relations agency for Onyx Pharmaceuticals. I have previously contributed edits to this page and have been grateful for guidance I received from the Wikipedia community. I would like to suggest additional edits that reflect the status of the new drug application for carfilzomib and research being conducted on the drug. Edits would be to the discovery and early development section and clinical trials sections. Adam Silverstein (talk) 17:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Discovery and early development
[edit]Carfilzomib was discovered and advanced to multiple Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials, including a pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial designed to seek accelerated approval, by Proteolix, Inc. Clinical trials for carfilzomib continue under Onyx Pharmaceuticals, which acquired Proteolix in 2009. In January 2011, the U.S. FDA granted carfilzomib fast-track status, allowing Onyx to initiate a rolling submission of its new drug application for carfilzomib. [1] In December 2011, the FDA granted Onyx standard review designation, [2] [3] for its new drug application submission based on the 003-A1 study, an open-label, single-arm Phase 2b trial. The trial evaluated 266 heavily-pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least two prior therapies, including bortezomib and either thalidomide or lenalidomide. [4] The PDUFA date, or FDA decision date, is July 27, 2012. [3]
Clinical trials
[edit]In a frontline phase 1/2 study, the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone was highly active and well-tolerated, permitting the use of full doses for an extended time in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, with limited ned for dose modification. Responses were rapid and improved over time, reaching 100% very good partial response. [5]
References
- ^ "Onyx multiple myeloma drug wins FDA fast-track status". San Francisco Business Times. 2011-1-31. Retrieved 2011-09-01.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Fast Track, Accelerated Approval and Priority Review; Accelerating Availability of New Drugs for Patients with Serious Diseases". FDA. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
- ^ a b "Beacon Breaking News – Carfilzomib to Get Standard, Not Priority, FDA Review". The Myeloma Beacon. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
- ^ "PX-171-003-A1, an open-label, single-arm, phase (Ph) II study of carfilzomib (CFZ) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM): Long-term follow-up and subgroup analysis". ASCO 2009. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
- ^ "Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)". ASH 20111;Abstract 631. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
Edits to carfilzomib page
[edit]I would ask Wikipedia community to please reach out to me if there are questions or concerns about suggested edits made to the carfilzomib page. Adam Silverstein (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Whats happening with the phase III trial
[edit]now that you have FDA approval. Did it fully recruit, and when will interim and final results be released ? - Rod57 (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Has it been submitted for EU approval
[edit]or anywhere else ? - Rod57 (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Did Proteolix call it PX-171
[edit]Did anyone call it PR-171 ? Who named it carfilzomib ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Oral or IV
[edit]The infobox says IV but Carfilzomib Promising in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma says Oral - If it is always oral can someone fix the infobox ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Carfilzomib Structure Image
[edit]Image of carfilzomib's structure should be flipped left to right, following standard peptide drawing guidelines128.163.7.150 (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Proposed Changes to Carfilzomib Page -- 7/23/13
[edit]My name is Adam Silverstein. I am with WCG, a public relations agency for Onyx Pharmaceuticals. I have previously contributed edits to this page (please see talk sections above for reference) appreciate the guidance I received from the Wikipedia community. On behalf of Onyx, I would like to open a conversation and suggest additional edits that: 1) reflect the status of the approval of carfilzomib 2) provide important details regarding the safety and efficacy (as stated by FDA) of carfilzomib and 3) clarify and provide updates on clinical trials of carfilzomib Edits would be made to:
- Upfront, to reflect approvals
- Discovery, early development and regulatory approval
- Clinical trials
- Ongoing section, to reflect status of ASPIRE
I will start new sections for each of these so the edits can be viewed easily. I request and welcome feedback on these edits. Thank you. Adam Silverstein (talk) 22:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
FDA Approval of Kyprolis
[edit]The US FDA (FDA) approved carfilzomib on 20 July 2012 for use in patients with multiple myeloma. who have received at least two prior therapies, including treatment with bortezomib and an immunomodulatory therapy and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy. Approval is based on response rate. Clinical benefit, such as improvement in survival or symptoms, has not been verified.[1] Full prescribing information is available here.[2]
In January 2011, the FDA granted carfilzomib fast-track status, allowing Onyx to initiate a rolling submission of its new drug application for carfilzomib.[3] In December 2011, the FDA granted Onyx standard review designation, [4][5] for its new drug application submission based on the 003-A1 study, an open-label, single-arm Phase IIb trial. The trial evaluated 266 heavily-pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least two prior therapies, including bortezomib and either thalidomide or lenalidomide.[6] It costs approximately $10,000 per 28-day cycle, making it the most expensive FDA-approved drug for multiple myeloma.[7]
- Suggest additional details on the approval, and including access to full U.S. FDA prescribing information for Kyprolis.
- Suggest deltion of "Carfilzomib was approved by the FDA for use in patients relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. When it launches..." as the drug is approved. Edits have been made in above paragraphs to reflect approved indication
- Suggest editing cost section to reflect drug costs approximately $100,000 per 28-day cycle
Adam Silverstein (talk) 22:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
References
- ^ "FDA Approves Kyprolis for Some Patients with Multiple Myeloma". FDA. 2012-07-20. Retrieved 2013-07-23.
- ^ "Carfilzomib Prescribing Information". NCI Drug Dictionary. Retrieved 2013-07-23.
- ^ "Onyx multiple myeloma drug wins FDA fast-track status". San Francisco Business Times. 2011-01-31. Retrieved 2011-09-01.
- ^ "Beacon Breaking News – Carfilzomib to Get Standard, Not Priority, FDA Review". The Myeloma Beacon. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
- ^ "Fast Track, Accelerated Approval and Priority Review; Accelerating Availability of New Drugs for Patients with Serious Diseases". FDA. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
- ^ "PX-171-003-A1, an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase (Ph) II Study of Carfilzomib (CFZ) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (R/R MM):Long-term follow-up and subgroup analysis."
- ^ "FDA Approves Kyprolis (Carfilzomib) For Relapsed And Refractory Multiple Myeloma". The Myeloma Beacon. Retrieved 2013-07-23.
Discovery, early development and regulatory approval
[edit]Carfilzomib is derived from epoxomicin, a natural product that was shown by the laboratory of Craig Crews at Yale University to inhibit the proteasome.[1] The Crews laboratory subsequently invented a more specific derivative of epoxomicin named YU101,[2] which was licensed to Proteolix, Inc. Craig Crews, Raymond Deshaies from Caltech and Phil Whitcome, the former CEO of Neurogen, founded Proteolix and along with other researchers and scientists, advanced YU101. The scientists at Proteolix invented a new, distinct compound that had potential use as a drug in humans, known as carfilzomib. Proteolix advanced carfilzomib to multiple Phase I and II clinical trials, including a pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial designed to seek accelerated approval.[3] Clinical trials for carfilzomib continue under Onyx Pharmaceuticals, which acquired Proteolix in 2009.
- Suggesting addition of details on discovery of carfilzomib
Adam Silverstein (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
References
- ^ Meng, L (1999). "Epoxomicin, a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor, exhibits in vivo antiinflammatory activity". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96 (18): 10403–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10403. PMC 17900. PMID 10468620.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Myung, J (2001). "Lack of proteasome active site allostery as revealed by subunit-specific inhibitors". Mol Cell. 7 (2): 411–20. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00188-5. PMID 11239469.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Carfilzomib: From Discovery To Drug
Completed Clinical Trials
[edit]A single-arm, phase 2 trial (003-A1) of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma showed that single-agent carfilzomib demonstrated a clinical benefit rate of 36 percent in the 266 patients evaluated and had an overall response rate of 22.9 percent and median duration of response of 7.8 months. The FDA approval of carfilzomib was based on results of the 003-A1 trial.[1]
- Suggest editing to reflect final results of 003-A1 trial and reflect U.S. FDA prescribing information
- Suggest reordering to reflect chronological numbering of trials
In a phase II trial (004), carfilzomib had a 53 percent overall response rate among patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who had not previously received bortezomib. This study also included a bortezomib-treated cohort. Results were reported separately.[2]It additionally found prolonged carfilzomib treatment was tolerable, with approximately 22 percent of patients continuing treatment beyond one year.[3]The 004 trial was a smaller study originally designed to investigate the impact of carfilzomib treatment in relationship to bortezomib treatment in less heavily pretreated (1-3 prior regimens) patients.[4]
- Suggest adding details to reflect bortezomib-treated cohort
- Suggest adding details on original design of 004 trial
A phase II trial (005), which assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of carfilzomib, in patients with multiple myeloma and varyi ng degrees of renal impairment, where nearly 50 percent of patients were refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide, demonstrated that pharmacokinetics and safety were not influenced by the degree of baseline renal impairment. Carfilzomib was tolerable and demonstrated efficacy.[5]
- This is new information
- Suggest adding to provide results of this trial
In another phase II trial (006) of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone demonstrated an overall response rate of 69 percent.Cite error: The <ref>
tag has too many names (see the help page).
- Suggest updating to reflect final results of this trial. Changes are minor and reflect "69" percent as final overall response rate
A Phase II trial (007) for multiple myeloma and solid tumors showed promising results.[6] [7]
- Suggest adding additional reference to this section
- Suggest renaming section "Completed Clinical Trials" to reflect closed trials and answer Rod57 on completed versus ongoing trials
Adam Silverstein (talk) 22:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
References
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
dd2
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Vij, R (2012). "An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have been previously treated with bortezomib". Br J Haematol. 158 (6): 739–748. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09232.x. PMC 17900. PMID 10468620.
- ^ "The effect of carfilzomib (CFZ) in patients (Pts) with bortezomib (BTZ)-naive relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Updated results from the PX-171-004 study". ASCO 2011; Abstract 8026. 2011. Retrieved 2011-09-01.
- ^ Vij, R (2012). "An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 (PX-171-004) study of single-agent carfilzomib in bortezomib-naive patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma". Blood. 119 (24): 5661–70. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-03-414359. PMID 22555973.
- ^ Badros, AZ (2013). "Carfilzomib in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: pharmacokinetics and safety". Leukemia. doi:10.1038/leu.2013.29. PMID 23364621.
{{cite journal}}
: Text "Epub ahead of print" ignored (help) - ^ "Nikoletta Lendval, MD PhD et al. Phase II Study of Infusional Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma". Presented at: 54th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition: December 2012. Retrieved 2013-07-23.
- ^ "Phase II results of Study PX-171-007: A phase Ib/II study of carfilzomib (CFZ), a selective proteasome inhibitor, in patients with selected advanced metastatic solid tumors" - ASCO 2009; Abstract 3515.
Image Update
[edit]Proteins are typically represented from the amino to the carboxyl end, however the image on this page is depicted in the reverse. Does anyone have an image that shows the standard orientation? (Adamtrifiro (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC))
Suggested updates to carfilzomib page.
[edit]My name is Alana Rogers, I am with Ruder Finn, a public relations agency for Onyx Pharmaceuticals. I would like to suggest an edit to the “Discovery, early development and regulatory approval” section. The last sentence of this section says “It costs approximately $10,000 per 28-day cycle, making it the most expensive FDA-approved drug for multiple myeloma.” Our proposed revision is “It costs approximately $10,000 per 28-day cycle.” The proper source for this edit is: Fierce Biotech: Pomalyst- The New Oral Med That's Expected to Grow the Multiple Myeloma Market (Published January 6, 2014): [1] Please reach out with any questions. Rogers116 (talk) 16:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC) rogersa@ruderfinn.com
References
- The "most expensive" claim does appear to be outdated so I have removed it. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Time to update this article!
[edit]Nothing has been said about the ASPIRE trial, although results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine back in 2014: http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1411321
I'm not medically knowledgeable, so I'll leave the actual updating to someone who is. 173.66.241.122 (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)