Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Requests for page protection | |
---|---|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Reason: After a period of protection of three weeks previously, the vandalism has continued since the protection ended on 24 February. Michaeldble (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism in the past few days detriaskies 00:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- (Comment) This article was semi-protected before because of the same reason few days ago. Requesting longer protection. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Bunch of dynamic IPs are edit warring to remove notability tags. No discussion is taking place. McSly (talk) 03:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits and vandalism by newly created single-purpose accounts. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 04:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous attack of meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry. POV pushing from both sides. Imperial[AFCND] 07:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unverified edits, particularly those pertaining to the subject's death date and DOB, have come back since the previous protection expired just hours ago. I would recommend semi-locking the article for a month. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts. LibStar (talk) 11:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Looking at edit history, I think the page would benefit from semi-protection, because of the apparently frequent need to revert edits by users that are either unregistered or not auto-confirmed. Choucas Bleu (T·C) 11:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism one IP was blocked, continued by a second IP Adakiko (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Addition of unsourced content by IPs again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 12:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 13:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive editing by LOUT-socking new editor. Most likely block evasion of User:Dedy Tisna Amijaya. Austronesier (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of LTA. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Indefinite semi, or at least an extension of the temporary protection by 6 months. Sockpuppet promotional edits by the same user across several accounts and IPs ([1], [2][3], [4], [5], [6]) since last December up until yesterday. For the protection to expire a week from now opens the door too soon for more vandal edits, which also poses an necessary time sink for patrollers. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 16:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)