Talk:Kumaon Regiment

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Fair use rationale for Image:Kumaon Regiment insignia.png

Image:Kumaon Regiment insignia.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kumaon Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090410115110/http://indianarmy.nic.in/arms/kumaon/history.html to http://indianarmy.nic.in/arms/kumaon/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Engagements

There should be a section for the 1947 battle of Kashmir. --Patbahn (talk) 23:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of recent edits

Mahensingha, I think the recent changes by 86.152.131.101 were constructive and did not change anything per our references. The changes were basic rewording of the existing content and did not warrant a revert(or at least a full revert). The same IP editor has also edited other Indian Army regimental pages and these edits look fine to me. Can you please explain your objections to these edits? Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning from lead section, the source nowhere says that It (Regiment) recruits Ahirs from North India exclusively, hence the specific area finds no place in the lead. Secondly, regarding "Colonels of the Regiment" section, the whole section is unsourced/uncited and in this case how can we amend the facts. Which source warrants the modification is certainly needed. The edits made by said i.p. are certainly baseless. I hope you can understand the reason of revert. Thanks and regards.--MahenSingha (Talk) 20:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mahensingha, Fair enough. Thanks for the clarification. Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kumaon Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Walong

This section's content is entirely unsourced, but I'm not exactly willing to simply remove the section, as there are a few sources that can be used, such as [[1]]. These may be POV, but it's better than not having a source at all. If someone else were to rewrite the description per these sources, it would be a great help. Solamian (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr. Solamian. I have now added all the relevant sources particularly the DO number of the Letter from the commander. I also took the opportunity to update the developments subsequent to 1986. 116.87.142.125 (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The section Ethnicity of troops needs to be removed because of it’s disputed status

Hi, I’ve been going through the article and thought to mention here that the section “Ethnicity of Troops” was very poorly sourced and, upon opening the references, none of them clearly gave any statistics for the same. Also, additionally, the Indian Army says that it’s totally against this caste proportion, and has also dropped naming new regiments after castes. So, I guess, as far as some ground strong references are not added, we can agree to remove that section from here. Shresthsingh71 (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that no discussion has been initiated formally by user WhiteRaven, and continuous reverting has been done. Additionally, I saw his edit history, he has in some way or the other involved in pages related to Kumaoni people, Kumaon region, Garhwal or Kumaoni language etc. I guess somewhere related to the ethnic group of Kumaon. The same has been exhibited since a long time here on this page. A section of ethnicity that has been poorly souced is being glorified to show the article in respect of a particular group or ethnicity, to demonstrate the valour in the name of one community, while in fact the regiment continues to get it troops from different parts of India. Shresthsingh71 (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i think you didn't read the source cited in the article. a citation from the official government controlled websites can't be categorized as poor source, secondly where did i glorified a particular community? the paragraph clearly mentions it gets the recruitment from multiple regions(from hills of uttarakhand as well from the different regions of plains) moreover the quantity is as well mentioned in the source.WhiteRaven335 (talk) 15:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add what I said to you on your talk page. Yes, I see. Thanks for the complement. I hope you recognise similar IP addressed in all the Wikipedians who edit pages supposedly related to your community. I get that, but rest assured, I am not like you or the one you familiarise with. Well, thanks for replying on the talk page after a very long time, or rather first time to be more specific. Let’s come to the topic. I read the sources, the first one is the indian army website reference, that opens a blank page and that has nothing related to the proportions mentioned here. Reference No. 2 is that of Indian army website main page, or the lead section. Nothing related to Kumaon regiment given on that page, to be specific about this topic. Third reference is the only reference that I found out to be relevant, a book by Gautam Sharma, but that also includes something that you would not or haven’t liked to present here, and of which you’ve only presented partial fact. You ask me to read, ironically I think you should go and take a look at Page nos: 266, 267,270, 275, 280. It is mentioned “Kumaonis form sizeable composition in Kumaon regiment along with Ahirs” You removed “Ahir” from the preexistant sentence and also added Brahman and Kshatriya to the kumaons. At the same time, the 75 percent Kumaon proportion is mentioned that it says is was in 1935, which here says 80, that too in 2020. Meanwhile no recent percentage is either mentioned in the book, nor is any information released by the Army regarding the same. See friend, you may do anything you want to glorify your community, but that doesn’t work here on Wikipedia, you need to do that somewhere else. Refrain from unnecessary reverting. Help Wikipedia stay neutral. Thanks! Shresthsingh71 (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert edits where information is getting deleted

credible sources and references provided. 223.233.65.21 (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content with credible independent, various news sources are being removed as "Vandalism". Preservation of information is necessary to enrich wikipedia article. No court order exists and no defamation is caused with factual truthful content. 223.233.79.240 (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]