Jump to content

Talk:SCIB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Davemck (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 15 March 2024 (rmv duplicate parm (via WP:JWB)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Chemistry

[edit]

it is Lithium titanate just like Altairnano's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabalah70 (talkcontribs) 19:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what kind of battery technology is this? maybe FePO4?

No, I don't think it is LiFePO4 technology. I think it is a lithium titanium battery - Lithium titanate Li4Ti5O12. This is what is used for the anode. there is probably some new ceramic polymer electrolyte like something from ORMOCER technology with a polyethylene fabric separator , and something else for the cathode - maybe Lithium Colbalt LiCoO2 or a spinel like Lithium Maganese Oxide.

Does anyone know why the amp hours are so low? It seems to me that most 24v batteries are above 10 amp hours. For an electric car or bike, it might be fast charging, but wouldn't this small amp hour mean that the range is very limited without a recharge?

BTW, I hope that new vehicle designs include regenerative breaking and regenerative shocks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.94.176.22 (talk) 03:33, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

marketing vs chemistry

[edit]

Is it notable enough for wiki? current article looks like marketing and needs more info about the battery itself. `a5b (talk) 13:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information about the battery is at Lithium-titanate battery. This article is just advertising for a Toshiba brand name.--Lester 23:12, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Is there a clear ref, where SCIB is typed as Lithium-titanate? `a5b (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a reference for SCiB being a Lithium Titanate battery. This article would really qualify for speedy deletion. SCiB is purely a brand name.--Lester 20:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've taken it upon myself to redirect the article to Lithium-titanate battery. If anyone disagrees, the previous version can be seen here. --Lester 20:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that I disagree, but we were having a discussion, and I thought it is customary to let these things roll for a week. However, what's done is done. I'll check later what other information can/should be added to Lithium-titanate battery. --Muhandes (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]