This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This article contains a number of phrases (e.g. "immediate acclaim", "excitement of fans") that seem aimed to promote the project rather than just inform readers about it. Most of these are sourced to third-party outlets, and I'm not suggesting some need for criticism to "balance" the praise, but the goal of Wikipedia neutral description. Can the praise be toned down without resulting in overly dry writing? (I'm not going to attempt it myself, because I quite like the outlet.) Cnilep (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cnilep, if you'd be inclined to read through the secondary sources to assess how neutrally or not the entry reflects them, I don't think your liking the outlet disqualifies you from revising to improve the entry! (We can only imagine what percentage of Wikipedia would not exist if liking a topic dq'ed editors from working on it!) As you can tell, my assessment of the secondary sources was that there was a striking amount of enthusiasm--it's actually what prompted me to write the entry, as I hadn't previously been a regular CS reader/listener, I'd just seen so much press about it (especially the podcast, which had press coverage for the better part of a year before the first episode was even released) that I was surprised to find it absent from Wikipedia. So I thought I could at least get it started with some broad strokes about the project and how it's been received. But for sure, if you think I've overstated the analysis as presented by reliable secondary sources, by all means, improvements on that score or any other are greatly appreciated! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Update to say I was expanding some other sections of this entry so took a stab at revising the language Cnilep cited; I hope those spots are improved and I also think/hope the expansion of other sections less focused on reception makes the entry feel more balanced, but I'd be glad for more eyes on! Innisfree987 (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki Education assignment: Writ 2 - Academic Writing
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 1 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Serendipitysss.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 1 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Serendipitysss.