Jump to content

Talk:Linda Giudice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Catfurball (talk | contribs) at 15:39, 29 March 2024 (Photograph requested.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 00:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Linda Giudice; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Thank you for writing this article Silver seren. Article is new enough and long enough. It is well-sourced, written neutrally, presentable, and BLP-compliant. Earwig gives a high percentage, but it is almost entirely proper names of institutions and titles. QPQ has been done. The hooks are interesting, though I think ALT0 needs to be reworded to reflect that there was a correlation between Bisphenol A and miscarriage rates, rather than saying that it contributes to higher rates. gobonobo + c 18:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Gobonobo! I've changed contributes to correlates, as you suggested, does that work or did you want a larger restructuring of the hook? SilverserenC 00:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That addresses my concern exactly. This is good to go. gobonobo + c 00:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]