Jump to content

Talk:Lionbridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Deepfriedokra (talk | contribs) at 15:12, 30 April 2024 (Reverted edit by Yahya dallal (talk) to last version by Cewbot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comments

[edit]

I added some ext. industry news links about the management change at Lionbridge Clsbasel (talk) 11:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some content removed due to lack of adherence to Wikipedia:Verifiability and/or Wikipedia:Neutrality policies. Jzz3424 (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The content removed by Jzz3424 concerning the case of DerKervorkian was well documented and confirmed by a reliable source. There was no reason to remove it: 1 DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Technologies, No. 04-cv-01160-LTB-CBS, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4191 (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2006), *[DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge] The case of the fired union founder was described here:

The title "union-busting" record could be questioned (IMHO it is appropriate), but not the fact that such an occurrence took place. Castorx (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The citation "Interpretation service picketed by trade unions, activists". Metro Eireann. 10 July 2008. Retrieved 19 June 2013. on Lionbridge company page is no longer accessible. Update: I added the above ITIA bulleting and found and this archived link at [Metro Eireann] Clsbasel (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the citation: "Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.". Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. Stanford Law School. 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2013. Does any body have alternative links/sources? Clsbasel (talk) 07:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Looks like this link provides more info and is comparable to the previous broken link: [Stanford Law]Clsbasel (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs work

[edit]

I read this article and looked at the Lionbridge web page. This article seems more like a plug for the companies services than encyclopedic content. It needs major revisions. I question the Neutrality of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.99.50.219 (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lionbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Earnings

[edit]

If anybody knows the earnings/revenues of this company, please add it in the article.... many companies' articles have this info ..thanks --Adamstraw99 (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect lead information?

[edit]

If details in the lead are outdated or incorrect, they should be corrected of course - in a neutral and verifiable manner. To clarify the issue, it would be helpful to list the specific details that are wrong here - without PR speak and extraordinary promotional claims. Also, all promotional claims need independent 3rd-party sources or should be removed on sight. GermanJoe (talk) 18:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]