Jump to content

Draft talk:Gumn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 182.182.97.3 (talk) at 13:13, 8 May 2024 (→‎WP:Notability: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconTelevision Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPakistan Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WP:Notability

Hey User:Saqib, care to elaborate on what grounds you declined the draft?182.182.97.3 (talk) 22:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already explained the reasoning over there. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jang, The Nation (Pakistan) are not reliable, secondary or independent? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey User:S0091, you said there should be reliable sources for an article to be published. What about this draft? Multiple sources that meets WP:GNG, still declined, Why? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of asking me to determine which source is reliable or not, you need to provide sourcing here. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[1],[2] are these not reliable? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 22:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As @S0091 mentioned earlier, it doesn't meet the four criteria listed at WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which criteria it doesn't meet? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 22:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey User:Drmies, can you please review the articles as I feel User:Saqib has been biased in exercising his judgment as articles does meet WP:GNG as required for a TV show. You can compare the referencing with any Netflix based series. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as this Draft is concerned, Do you think Dawn (Newspaper) and The Nation (newspaper) are not reliable? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 10:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Despite others explaining to this IP here and here, they persist in WP:BLUDGEONING their point. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are WP:BLUDGEONING and removing sources from the article, are you afraid that it might get accepted for publication? Let it be how's it then. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: I believe 182.182.97.3 (talk · contribs · 182.182.97.3 WHOIS) should also be blocked from editing this draft because they repeatedly request reviews without making any single edits, let alone improvements. Their tedious editing is wasting our time. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because multiple administrators have said that the draft meet WP:GNG but you are biased while reviewing my draft. User:Daniel Case, I have mentioned the issue on WP:Teahouse as well. Kindly provide a solution or let this draft review by any other administrator other than User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide diff of admin stating that this draft is acceptable? And just for clarity, I'm fine with anyone reviewing this. I don't have any objections. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User_talk:Drmies#BeauSuzanne Here, Just check. And even after you removed crap sources which are not crap, as Youlin Magazine is a reliable, independent published Magazine, Draft have enough sources to be accepted. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 11:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just because a magazine has a WP page doesn't automatically make it WP:RS. And as for @Drmies, I haven't seen them call the draft acceptable. Since you've reinstated non-RS in the draft, I view it as WP:DISRUPTIVE. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok even if Youlin Magazine isn't considered, there are reliable sources left behind. And User:Drmies have said that sourcing isn't worse as you've declined it on the basis of WP:RS 182.182.97.3 (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Liz, User:ToadetteEdit, User:Drmies, User:S0091 Hey you all, can any of you guys review my draft as an independent reviewer? I will happily accept the outcome based on your judgements. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You gotta show some coverage here that meet WP:SIRS to help establish WP:GNG. WP:COMPETENCE is definitely missing. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the draft have 3-4 sources that covers WP:RS and establish WP:SIRS along with sources that covers the subject in-depth. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather not respond because you engaged in WP:FORUMSHOP against me repeatedely. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still you're interested in reviewing and declining my drafts. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 12:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely because too much harm's been done by UPEs, but starting now, I'd like to ensure we keep unwarranted pages away from WP. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about the UPEs and their damages, I'm concerned with my drafts only specifically this one cause I'm quite sure that it meets WP:Notability. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 12:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, I don't feel like arguing with you because I have other tasks to handle as well. Since you've tagged others and asked them to review the draft, let's wait for their input. But I have to say, your sourcing is really lacking. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, Let others decide this. Apologies, if you felt disprespected. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Gumn&oldid=1222873700"