Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 16

May 16

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 16, 2024.

Noise(manga)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noise(manga) → NOiSE (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Malformed title. Noise (manga) already exists. Recent speedy deletion tag was removed without explanation. Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete meets all WP:X3 criteria, which is why I tagged it. Would be nice if User:Shah Of Nowhere would provide an explanation when contesting speedies though that is not required. Since it has been contested though I have no problem with the listing here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 20:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although its existed since 2006 its always been a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete under the recent WP:X3 criteria. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 23:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This is a valid speedy delete. The only way a WP:X3 could be contested is in the case of extensive histories or copy-paste moves such as National Expressway 1(India) 104.7.152.180 (talk) 03:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Forbidden hot dog

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forbidden hot dog → Typha (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target, google yeilds nothing Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not mentioned, potentially confusing, ambiguous and obscure. In sum D2 and D8 are both clearly applicable here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. D8 – "novel or very obscure". Nurg (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just a variant of the obscure forbidden meme. Basically something that looks like food but is actually not. For example, a landmine is considered a forbidden can of tuna. --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Something, something, WP:SNOW? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (and send to WP:DAFT) Seems too neologistic or obscure. Xeroctic (talk) 09:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Forbidden redirect, also known as a delete. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Open Fire(album)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open Fire(album) → Open Fire (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history, no incoming links from mainspace, and where a page with an otherwise identical but correctly spaced disambiguator exists, speedy contested by User:Rosguill for having too many pageviews; while that is not an exception to WP:X3, I have no problem bringing this here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it was at this title for less than a day in 2010. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete due to malformed dabifier --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per X3: One pageview over an entire 366-day period is not a non-trivial number of pageviews. "Minor page history" is rather generous; actually, the redirect has no content history. The speedy deletion tag should probably be restored. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Dsuke1998AEOS, because speedy deletion is supposed to be uncontroversial, so long as someone who is not the creator contests a speedy in good-faith (i.e. not a vandal, troll, UPE etc.) then that particular speedy tag should not be readded and if no other ones apply then the page goes to the appropriate XFD.
I too disagree with User:Rosguills assertion, but a few extra XFDs here and there are no big deal. The only reason we even have CSD is to keep the volume down; a few extra days on pages that have existed for years are insubstantial. And there is always a chance they get snow-closed anyway so the time difference is even less. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:2C4B:B172:D025:C559 (talk) 21:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For my part, my thinking is that, particularly since X3 is a new criterion, I should err on the side of caution when considering speedy deletion tags. Once there's a clearer track record as to what level of usage is actually considered enough to keep a bad redirect at RfD, I and other admins will be able to calibrate accepting or declining X3s accordingly. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, I don't mind. Though if one pageview in the last year is enough to disqualify them WP:X3 might as well not exist so that bar seems too low. RFD discussions like this one will actually help to further determine best practices going forward so there is benefit regardless. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:2C4B:B172:D025:C559 (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Behind the Garden - Behind the Wall - Under the Tree(album)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Garden - Behind the Wall - Under the Tree(album) → Behind the Gardens (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history, no incoming links from mainspace, and where a page with an otherwise identical but correctly spaced disambiguator exists, speedy contested by User:Rosguill for having too many pageviews; while that is not an exception to WP:X3, I have no problem bringing this here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it was at this title for less than a month in 2009. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the page history isn't significant enough in order to keep it. Also, there seems to be another redirect with "substantive history": Where Do I Begin (remix)(Shirley Bassey single) 104.7.152.180 (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kingspade(album)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingspade(album) → Kingspade (album) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history, no incoming links from mainspace, and where a page with an otherwise identical but correctly spaced disambiguator exists, speedy contested by User:Rosguill for having too many pageviews; while that is not an exception to WP:X3, I have no problem bringing this here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it was at this title for a few weeks in 2007. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to malformed modifier. --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per CSD X3 --Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delete per nom. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Google says that this term is strongly related to/correlated with the Ogg file format... top result says that oggcast is an RSS equivelent for ogg-format podcasts specifically, while other sources state that it is a streaming protocol for ogg format audio (of any sort). I suppose the google top result is why this redirect was created. I wonder if this term is notable enough to get a brief mention on the ogg page, and then we could redirect there... but I'm not sure, so I'll refrain from !voting at the moment. Fieari (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Ogg or Vorbis and add mention per Fieari. Enix150 (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan Bloch: can comment further. While the removal mentioned in the nomination said ..no longer notable. The only third party source is from the Internet Archive., just one day prior, DanBloch had reduced the multi-sourced 3-4 paragraph section to a single liner (alongwith removing sections such as Political podcast and Podguide). Jay 💬 10:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what sort of comment you're looking for from me. Per the nom, oggcast is no longer mentioned in the article (nor should it be, per WP:BALASP), so this isn't a great redirect. Redirecting to Ogg would probably be better, especially if someone added a mention there. But mostly it doesn't matter because no one uses it. As far as I'm concerned either solution is fine, or even leaving it is fine. Dan Bloch (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I was looking for was comments or explanation regarding the removal I mentioned, of 11,446 bytes where the edit summary only said Variants: cleanup. From your response I now see that you removed it as per WP:BALASP. Jay 💬 11:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Ogg per Enix 104.7.152.180 (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pomosexuality

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 23#Pomosexuality

May 16

Noise(manga)

Forbidden hot dog

Open Fire(album)

Behind the Garden - Behind the Wall - Under the Tree(album)

Kingspade(album)

Draft:2025 IndyCar Series

Severa

Oggcast

Pomosexuality