This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Voynich manuscript article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Voynich manuscript is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
Where was VM found by Voynich
The article gives Villa Mondragone, Frascati as the place where the VM rested until offered for sale to W. M. Voynich. But apparently, that's not right and the actual place was Villa Torlonia in Castel Gandolfo (near Rome again). There was some secrecy around the sale that perhaps led to this confusion. (source: [1]) Mandevil (talk) 19:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Terminological distinctions
ApLundell, the reason why, in the "Voynich manuscript" lead, I changed "decipher" to "decrypt" is that cryptologists reserve "decipherment" for the reading of a cipher by its intended recipient; and "decryption", for the reading of either a cipher or a code by an unauthorized recipient.
Similarly, while persons innocent of the difference between a cipher and a code often, in English, refer to either as a "code", there is a very basic distinction between a cipher and a code. (Some other languages commit the opposite error, calling both a code and a cipher a "cipher".) David Kahn, in his The Codebreakers (loosely titled thus for readers innocent of the differences!) very carefully explains the distinctions.
You don't need to put a message on my talk page, page me to it, then put the same message here, and page me here.
Anyway, here's the reply I was about to put on my talk page :
"Decipher", outside of crypto industry jargon, has a bunch of meanings at least one of which must apply to the manuscript, but "decrypt" specifically implies that the text is some form of code or cipher, which is not established and implying otherwise is a point of contention. If using the plain English meaning of "decipher" offends those who insist words must only be used according to narrowly defined jargon, then I suppose "understood" or "explained" would also work there, but to my mind that would be a slightly weaker sentence.
I'm not sure why you bring up the difference between codes and ciphers. I do understand the difference, but to my knowledge applying either to the manuscript is entirely speculation. ApLundell (talk) 04:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very much with ApLundell here. Approaching the Voynich as being written in either a code or a cipher is to assume facts not in evidence and very much in dispute. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 13:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I note above, the verb "to decrypt" is applicable to either a cipher or a code, particularly to the reading of an enciphered or encoded text by an unintended recipient.
The verb "to decrypt" comes from the Greek for "to uncover" or "to render unsecret". Even If the Voynich manuscript were to prove neither a cipher nor a code, the verb "to decrypt" would still remain applicable to that manuscript. At the same time, that verb's use would make a small contribution to preventing public misapprehension and misapplication of the terms "cipher" and, more especially, "code", which in recent years has been massively misused.
You are still assuming facts not in evidence. In order to be "decrypted," there would have to be an underlying message. It has not been proven that is the case. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greek italics could be the way it has been written
The text in the Voynych Manuscript could be Greek Italics. Lara3030 (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It could be telling a story about nitric oxide (which was not even discovered at the time of the manuscript's assumed creation date) and the importance of health directions to try and avoid ovarian cancer. These words could be picked up by running a Greek to Russian translation with Google Lens (Google Lens seems to pick up some parts of the text as Greek Italics). Lara3030 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is also something about the Greek army service in 401 BC, though I may be wrong. Lara3030 (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The text could be many things, but only hypotheses repeated in reliable secondary sources warrant inclusion in the article. Otherwise the article would be much too long. Also, Google Lens, like all machine learning models, is based on guesswork and often makes mistakes. Justin Kunimune (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lara3030 What do you mean? This is what I intend with "Greek italics".-- Carnby (talk) 11:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the heads-up! I am not sure that it is WP:DUE for inclusion in the article at this point, but it may be in the future. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another attempt
News from Italy. Scholar Eleonora Matarrese states she has deciphered the manuscript: la Repubblica (quite reliable source).-- Carnby (talk) 11:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It may be churnalism given how much of that text is an exact copy of similar sites like Adnkronos and iLLibraio. I'm not sure if this is enough to warrant mentioning as a decipherment claim on the article itself, but news articles come out every few years with similar claims and it's just the latest of a very, very long list. - Aoidh (talk) 22:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
