User talk:Yakov-kobi

Welcome!

Hello, Yakov-kobi!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, Takov-kobi. Despite Mr. Sphilbrick's very friendly warning above, you appear to have introduced many new, and rather blatant, copyright violations over the lasts few days at Three Sisters (2012 film), Holiday in the Sun (film), Hidden in the Woods (2012 film), Stand by Your Man (TV series), Over My Dead Body (1942 film), Beretta 418, Draft:Universal Design Kitchens, Draft:Industrial Brothers‎ and others. This is a serious problem. I've disabled this account until you outline your understanding of copyright, and can propose a path forward that is constructive. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sam Kuru (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I understand now that I have created a copyright problem. I read the copyright policy again and I promise that such a mistake will not happen again. I'm very sorry, I made a rookie mistake and it won't happen again in the future. I would appreciate it if you could unblock me.

Thanks in advance and sorry again.

kobi Yakov-kobi (talk) 02:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yakov-kobi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, :im replaying again for unblock and say sorry for my mistake and understand the Consequences involving copyright infringement and the risk I foolishly took. I promise that such a mistake will not happen again. And I am aware of copyright regulations as I wrote below. :Wikipedia copyright refers to the set of rules and guidelines in place to protect intellectual property and ensure the legal and ethical use of content contributed to the platform. It establishes the rights and responsibilities of contributors, safeguarding against unauthorized use of copyrighted material. :Wikipedia operates under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and, unless specified otherwise, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Under these licenses, contributors allow their original content to be freely distributed, reused, and built upon by others. This collaborative framework encourages the sharing of knowledge while maintaining legal and ethical standards. :Copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia if it adheres to the platform's copyright policies. Contributors must either be the copyright holders of the text they submit or use material from public domain or compatibly licensed sources. Copying material without permission from non-public domain sources is considered a copyright violation, and contributors must release their original content under Wikipedia's licenses. :In the case of images and other media, a variety of licenses are accepted, but the content must meet specific criteria to be deemed acceptable. :Handling of suspected copyright violations involves reporting issues on discussion pages and tagging pages accordingly. If contributors are copyright holders and wish to share their content on Wikipedia, they must release it under the platform's licenses. Contributors repeatedly violating copyright may face blocks to prevent further issues. :In summary, Wikipedia's copyright policies are designed to foster collaboration while respecting the intellectual property rights of contributors and other copyright holders. Users are encouraged to share information responsibly within the framework of the specified licenses. Yakov-kobi (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Defer to the open one below. Please don't open multiple unblock requests Star Mississippi 01:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yakov-kobi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,

I'm a new editor at Wikipedia and I wasn't fully aware of copyright regulations. מם' I realize my big mistake and after carefully reading Wikipedia's copyright rules I apologize from the bottom of my heart for the mistake I made. I would really appreciate it if you could please release the lock for me and I promise that such a mistake will not happen again. I want to contribute to the joint effort of the editors of Wikipedia and produce good and correct values in the future.

Many Thanks in advance and sorry again

kobi-yakov Yakov-kobi (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be convinced that you will not make further copyright violations and that you understand copyright. In your own words, please tell the next reviewing admin what copyright is, what Wikipedia's license is, and when.how copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia. Your answers to these questions are necessary to show us your understanding. See WP:COPYVIO. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yakov-kobi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, I'm replaying again for unblocking and saying sorry for my mistake and understanding the Consequences involving copyright infringement and the risk I foolishly took. I promise that such a mistake will not happen again. And I am aware of copyright regulations as I wrote below. Wikipedia copyright refers to the set of rules and guidelines in place to protect intellectual property and ensure the legal and ethical use of content contributed to the platform. It establishes the rights and responsibilities of contributors, safeguarding against unauthorized use of copyrighted material. Wikipedia operates under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and, unless specified otherwise, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Under these licenses, contributors allow their original content to be freely distributed, reused, and built upon by others. This collaborative framework encourages the sharing of knowledge while maintaining legal and ethical standards. Copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia if it adheres to the platform's copyright policies. Contributors must either be the copyright holders of the text they submit or use material from the public domain or compatibly licensed sources. Copying material without permission from non-public domain sources is considered a copyright violation, and contributors must release their original content under Wikipedia's licenses. In the case of images and other media, a variety of licenses are accepted, but the content must meet specific criteria to be deemed acceptable. Handling suspected copyright violations involves reporting issues on discussion pages and tagging pages accordingly. If contributors are copyright holders and wish to share their content on Wikipedia, they must release it under the platform's licenses. Contributors repeatedly violating copyright may face blocks to prevent further issues. In summary, Wikipedia's copyright policies are designed to foster collaboration while respecting the intellectual property rights of contributors and other copyright holders. Just so you know, users are encouraged to share information responsibly within the framework of the specified licenses. also, I learned to use this tool Earwig's Copyvio Detector (https://copyvios.toolforge.org/) from the internet to check if texts violate copyright policies. best regards kobi Yakov-kobi (talk) 7:59 pm, 1 January 2024, Monday (11 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

per discussion with blocking admin at special:permalink/1195182639#Unblock discussion. User must only add that content created by themself. Welcome back. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

@Kuru: OK to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Yakov - please just do not add anything that you did not completely write yourself. It's pretty easy to avoid this problem. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moran Kliger

Hi! I moved Moran kliger to Draft:Moran Kliger because the page isn't ready for mainspace. You should keep improving it and then submit for review when you're ready. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 05:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Yakov-kobi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yakov-kobi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple drafts

Hi, please don't create multiple drafts on the same subject; this is unnecessary, and creates all sorts of problems. You now have both User:Yakov-kobi/sandbox and Draft:Moran Kliger in the system – the latter seems to be less developed, and could probably be deleted? If you blank the contents, or place the {{Db-author}} template on it, we can get rid of it and move the sandbox draft there instead. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for posting an earlier draft. I started to write it and then I remembered that I can use the sandbox for preliminary editing before publishing.

sorry for my mistake. Yakov-kobi (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no worries. The other draft has now been deleted, so I've moved what was your sandbox draft to Draft:Moran Kliger. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Moran Kliger has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Moran Kliger. Thanks! Spinster300 (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moran Kliger (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

awards listed are somehow not significant. WP:ANYBIO states that significant awards establishes notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moran Kliger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 16:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI generated comments

Hi,

I noticed you've made some weirdly phrased comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luno (band), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Saint George S.C. players and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demons Bridge railway station (which OwenX struck). Have you been using ChatGPT or another AI for these comments?

I strongly recommend not writing any Wikipedia comments with AI. It adds a lot of extra words but removes all meaning. It's simpler and more useful for everyone if you just write things in your own words instead. Soni (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]