Jump to content

Talk:Wind

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 10 July 2024 (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Former featured articleWind is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 18, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 3, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
June 27, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
September 10, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Direction terminology

[edit]

I was reading the ENSO article and got confused about what an 'easterly' wind was. I came here and there was implications, but no explicit statements, so I added one.

In the process, I split the second intro paragraph topically into three: first overall classification, the second about Meteorology classification, and the third about solar wind. Took out an inapt sentence about spreading seeds, as that was present below, and tweaked that.

Hope you like it. OsamaBinLogin (talk) 00:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Role" in the natural world

[edit]

I could just change this, but considering this article is being reviewed and I could be wrong, I'll ask here first.

I feel the use of the word "role" in the heading and/or text feels a bit off to me.

For example the sentence "The role of wind is to erode rocks, or carry seeds" sounds like it is doing it on purpose, or it was designed to do this. Would other word not be better, like "effect" or "use" or something else. I suppose "role" might not technically be wrong, I just think there may be better words. What do others think? Am I talking nonsense? is my view of the word "role" wrong?

 Carlwev  05:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

removed from heading Chidgk1 (talk) 08:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Winds

[edit]

Introduction Type Explanation Conclusion advantage

diagram

Disadvantages 2409:4081:E80:A7A7:0:0:34C8:3815 (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]