Talk:Zirconium
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zirconium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
Zirconium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Untitled
Article changed over to new Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements format by maveric149. Elementbox converted 11:29, 6 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 05:32, 4 July 2005).
Information Sources
Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Zirconium. Additional text was taken directly from USGS Zirconium Statistics and Information, from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org), Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) (via dict.org) and WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table were obtained from the sources listed on the subject page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but were reformatted and converted into SI units.
"Zircronium" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zircronium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Physical properties and Characteristics do not match mp, bp
The Melting point and Boiling point listed under Physical properties (in the right-hand sidebar) and under Characteristics in the main body do not match. I am unsure where to find definitive information to correct this error. 72.135.238.191 (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
After reviewing this article, I do not believe this article meets the GA criteria anymore. Some of my concerns are listed below:
- I agree with the orange banner at the top that this article's lede is too short.
- There are multiple uncited paragraphs and sentences
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? If not, should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- GA-Class chemical elements articles
- High-importance chemical elements articles
- WikiProject Elements articles