Jump to content

Talk:Indianapolis Community Food Access Coalition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by IndyProgressive01 (talk | contribs) at 00:46, 17 July 2024 (→‎Created major update: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk18:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by JamieF (talk). Self-nominated at 01:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article long and new enough, and hook verifiable without significant signs of copyvio. QPQ is actually not needed as this is the user's 4th DYK - but their call. A little concerned about the hook's relatively mundane tone, but I suppose it's as good as it gets. @JamieF: maybe mention food desert somewhere in the hook? Juxlos (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks @Juxlos: I made a slight modification - and good point.

Created major update

[edit]

This article was previously outdated and misleading. The first reference was to a Purdue University resource about a different entity altogether (https://extension.purdue.edu/news/county/marion/2021/10/indy-food-access-advisory-commission.html). It did not cite Ordinance 337 that recognized the Coalition, nor did it include any history at all.

The section on "structure" needs to be updated according to the actual structure of the Coalition on their website. We also need to hyperlink to the group's website, which is currently in development.

The section on "purpose" is redundant and should be changed. IndyProgressive01 (talk) 00:46, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]