Talk:Singapore National Day parade
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2003
did anyone know who participate in the show segment for NDP 2003? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.74.105.36 (talk • contribs) 2006-05-14 18:35:01
Glaring mistakes on NDP website
- Originally submitted by Wsaiho at National Day Parade, 2006
On 21st July 2006, a forum article appeared on Straits Times, which detailed some grammatical mistakes on the NDP website.
Full Text of the Forum Letter
I WAS aghast when I was surfing the Net and found the National Day Parade 2006 website (http://www.ndp.org.sg).
On it were very basic grammatical errors and many syntax errors unbecoming of a website that is representative of our country.
It was stated that the website was designed by an external company and such low editorial standards make me wonder how the tender process was carried out, resulting in the company receiving the contract to design the website.
Some of the glaring errors include the following:
- 'The treatment of the brushstrokes given the logo an Asian feel, and it denotes that Singapore is evolving into a global city but not forgetting our roots and values. The way the globe is tilt, it gives a feel that the world is revolving around Singapore and we are in the centre of all action.'
A proper sentence would be: 'The brushstrokes give the logo an Asian feel and shows Singapore evolving into a global city while retaining its roots and values. The globe is tilted to show the world revolving around Singapore as we become the centre of all the action.'
- 'This year marks our nation 41st year of independence.'
It is imperative that the National Day Parade (NDP) Exco rectifies the problem as soon as possible; it is embarrassing that a website which is supposed to glorify our nation's achievements over the past 41 years ends up making a mockery of our standard of English.
I hope the NDP Exco will also explain how these mistakes came about.
Edgar Kieu Li Chong
Remedial Actions
Upon receiving the complaint, the National Day Parade website was updated, however grammatical errors can still be found on 22nd Jul.
Fair use rationale for Image:Logondp2007.gif
Image:Logondp2007.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:NDP 2000 logo.gif
Image:NDP 2000 logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Other songs?
should we have a list of songs that are not theme songs, such as moments of magic, singapore town, 5 stars arising etc Ragnaroknike (talk) 15:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
2014
I know that there are no official theme songs this year, but can we include the remakes of "We Will Get There" and "One People, One Nation, One Singapore", and "What Do You See" in the theme song list? 2679D (talk) 15:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Singapore National Day Parade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141010001459/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-celebrates-its/1305264.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-celebrates-its/1305264.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
File:1 singapore national day parade 2011 fireworks.jpg scheduled for POTD
Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:1 singapore national day parade 2011 fireworks.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 9, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-09. Any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
The Singapore National Day Parade is a national ceremony in Singapore that takes place each year on 9 August to commemorate the country's independence. The firework display seen here was part of the festivities in 2011, held at The Float @ Marina Bay, the world's largest floating stage and football stadium, located on the waters of the Marina Reservoir. In the foreground on the right is the lotus-flower-shaped ArtScience Museum, situated within Marina Bay Sands, an integrated resort that opened in the same year. Photograph credit: Chensiyuan
Recently featured:
|
Parade sequence
A random IP keeps re-inserting a lengthy, unsourced, "parade sequence" without any edit summary, explanation, or support. I've removed it twice and don't want to enter into an edit war, but this certainly appears to be crufty original research that isn't inherently encyclopedic. Other thoughts? --ZimZalaBim talk 13:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)