Jump to content

Talk:Grey columns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Asukite (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 2 August 2024 (Asukite moved page Talk:Grey column to Talk:Grey columns without leaving a redirect: Requested by Iztwoz at WP:RM/TR: Three columns are described; also Latin in infobox is in plural). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Student peer reviews

  1. Quality of the information: 2
    Good time range of sources
  2. Article size: 2
    (15,334 bytes)
  3. Readability: 1
    More links would be helpful, some sentence structures could be improved for clarity but overall good "
  4. References: 2
    More citations in the Role in Pain System and Lateral Grey Column sections would be helpful.
  5. Links: 2
    Could add more but sufficient linking and a red link Haptic" and "nociceptive" can be linked. "Analgesics" can also be linked.
  6. Responsive to Comments: 2
    no comments so no need for response
  7. Formatting: 2
    Formatting is a little confusing more of an intro about the three separate types may help to orient the reader. Pictures/diagrams would be extremely helpful
  8. Writing: 1
    Capitalize Laminae in the sentence "laminae III and IV....". The article switches between the European spelling "grey" and the American spelling "gray".
  9. Used Real Name: 2
  10. Is Outstanding in some way: 1
    Good article but not outstanding

Total: 17/20
Jsiemer3 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback Jessica. I standardized the page to only use one spelling of "grey". I will also add those links you suggested. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Quality of Information: 2
  2. Article size: 2
  3. Readability: 1
    Strong use of hyperlinks, but wording is sometimes confusing and article may not be understood completely by the average reader.
  4. Refs: 2
  5. Links: 2
    Strong use of links to other Wikipedia articles throughout.
  6. Responsive to comments: 2
    No comments
  7. Formatting: 2
    Good organization of sub-sections.
  8. Writing: 2
    Some awkward sentence structure, but overall the article is well written and consistent.
  9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
  10. Outstanding?: 1
    Only slightly over 15,000 Bytes and only obvious portions of the topic are discussed. Also, there are no figures or pictures to increase understanding.

Total: 18 out of 20
Ryandrsmith (talk) 15:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on restructuring some of the sentences. Thanks for the feedback. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I added a picture as you suggested. Thanks. Bsridhar6 (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Quality of Information: 2
  2. Article size: 2
  3. Readability: 2
    I have had no particular problem with readability.
  4. Refs: 2
  5. Links: 2
  6. Responsive to comments: 2
    No comments so far
  7. Formatting: 2
    Well-organized (anterior vs posterior vs lateral)
  8. Writing: 2
    Consistent and writing style
  9. Used real name: 2
  10. Outstanding?: 1
    A lot of information covered, but depth seems lacking a little bit

Total: 19 out of 20
JinYongSim (talk) 17:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback.Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Balaji Sridhar and I have spent the past months working on a new, detailed gray column page which has just been added. Bsridhar6 (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Section headers

Students: please note that the headers (titles) of each section are incorrectly capitalized, per MOS:CAPS. Please fix it. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback and link to the MOS, Tryptofish. I changed the sections headers to sentence case as listed in the link you provided. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Spinal cord horn

A small stub all of which covered in Grey column and in more detail Iztwoz (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Proposed merge of Posterior grey column into Grey column

Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Anterior grey column into Grey column

Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'''Support'''. Very confusing to have these stubs separately. Logically easier to have them in one place, and also easier for readers, editors, and wikignomes. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grey_columns&oldid=1238187448"