This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball articles
Taking about Steven van de Velde
Per [1]. It's probably best to leave extended commentary about this on the talk page if it's reverted again or other people have concerns. I genuinely do believe what I said in that edit summary:
They played together and it's useful context. I don't think it's WP:COATRACK worthy when a lot of the coverage about Immers goes into why his partnership with the other guy is controversial.
I understand why this might be dicey and I honestly am trying to handle this carefully because of that. I was very delicate in just how exactly I introduced the other guy because just saying "child rapist" when the article was two sentences like this IP did is not the best idea. But I genuinely think my edits strike the required balance here where there's context but it's not completely about the other guy. The background is nessecary for the reader to understand why they were both booed when they won their match, for example. Clovermoss🍀(talk)11:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
