Jump to content

User talk:Bully-Buster-007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A. B. (talk | contribs) at 02:00, 12 May 2007 (→‎Summary: WorkForAll spam on Wikipedia: update). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome,

Dont let my fierce name freighten You.
I am most friendly and have good intentions.
I do however hate bullying and would like to contribute to eradicate Cyber-bullying, verbal Harassment and all forms of Intimidation on this medium,
provide information to victims of such criminal behaviour
and devellop arguments, tools and techniques in accordance with Wikipedia:5_Pillars and Wikipedia:Etiquette
to stop all these forms of ciber-criminality and help to make Wikipedia a more friendly place to stay.
-

We have a first highly interesting test-case develloping here : User:Requestion versus User:Bully-Buster-007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Requestion#Please_stop_indiscriminate_mass_destruction If You have reasonable arguments do not hesitate to comment there to keep the conversation together as to this case. Please do keep to Wikipedia:Etiquette there as well.

.

The qualification "spam" for the Work For All contributions is being disputed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Requestion#Please_stop_indiscriminate_mass_destruction A. B. was given a first degree harrasment warning at (talk) for spreading unmotivated and/or disputable accusations and deliberate atttempts to harm the reputation of other users. --Bully-Buster-007 14:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Bully-Buster-007 but you don't get to dispute what qualifies as spam since that is defined at WP:SPAM. You also don't seem to understand that a WP:CONSENSUS has already been reached. I see that you gave User:A. B. [1] and me [2] the exact same warning. What is up with that? Your logic is absurd in both the philosophical and the surreal sense. There is no meaning. Don't you recognize the utter futility? I can understand your anger at me because I deleted a lot of your spam. The only thing A. B. has done is document your edits and point out some WP:RULES that you have violated. To tell you the truth, I feel insulted. I've deleted far more of the workforall.net spam than A. B. has and I demand a harsher warning! (Requestion 16:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Sorry Requestion, The dispute over the interpretation of Link-spam is still going on without WP:CONSENSUS being reached. So the grounds for the accusations you repeat here are still being disputed. By repeating them here You are ignoring our warning about spreading disputable accusations. This gives us reason enough for issuing a second degree harrasement warning. We are however not vindicative and do not want this to escalate as we realise we will have to reach WP:CONSENSUS sooner or later according to WP:ETIQUETTE. So we abstain from a formal second degree warning for the moment. However please realise the amount of harm you already inflicted to our reputation, and the harm you continue to do every minute you leave unappropriate accusations unerased. You seem to ignore the devastation you are causing to your victims and all of its possible consequences. So please erase the disputable accusations at once. I'll be most reasonable in consenting to removal of links where they are inappropriate. I'll defend them where they are appropriate. Please be advised to respect the first degree warning now a reasonable WP:CONSENSUS can still be reached. After a second degree harrasement warning this might become extremely difficult. --Bully-Buster-007 17:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CONSENSUS says "Consensus does not mean that everyone agrees with the outcome; instead, it means that everyone agrees to abide by the outcome." You may not be happy and you may never agree but consensus has been reached. Your last workforall.net link spam addition [3] on May 6 2007 was quickly deleted and no one, including you, has attempted to change that edit. The consensus in this case has a supermajority and even you seem to be abiding by it. So what is the problem? (Requestion 19:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
I think I made my point clear above. Time is ticking. --Bully-Buster-007 20:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How much time do I have to think about this? (Requestion 21:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
The warning was issued 9 May 2007 at 13:11 (UTC) and gave you 24 hours. it is now 21:55 (UTC) good night ! --Bully-Buster-007 21:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That isn't much time to contemplate. To be honest, I don't even know what the ramifications are. What do the level 2 and 3 warnings say? (Requestion 00:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Dear requestion,
the most urgent is to erase 4 disputable accusations of spam, as these are allready spreading through www and in search engine caches:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Requestion#workforall.net_linkspam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#workforall.net
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#workforall.net_linkspam
as well as in the summery here below.
You can start there. If you are of good faith It takes 1 minute to erase them. Or shall I help?
Warnings 2 and 3: better leave that to some obstinate harasser to find out.--Bully-Buster-007 01:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputable? Well then what do you call the 144 workforall.net external links that you've added? You also can't run around erasing stuff, Wikipedia doesn't work like that. On Wikipedia things get archived. (Requestion 02:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
You failed to provide evidence about the qualification "spam" in the debate on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Requestion#Please_stop_indiscriminate_mass_destruction. Your accusations of spam obviously are unfounded. Spreading unmotivated or disputable accusations can be considered as spam itself and can seriously harm the interests, reputation and privacy of other users. Deliberate attempts to harm the interests, reputation or privacy of other users is both a criminal offence and is incompatible with Wikipedia:5_Pillars and Wikipedia:Etiquette. In order to interrupt the ongoing damage You are kindly requested to remove unappropriate and disputed comments within 24hours. In order to keep the discussion together you are kindy invited to participate in discussion at the appropriate location where the discussion is still in progress. Please try to reach Wikipedia:Consensus there. Please do keep to Wikipedia:Etiquette there as well.
Your refusal to stop a process of ongoing damage to your opponent obviously makes Wikipedia:Consensus increasingly difficult. Your refusal to work toward agreement in a dispute is incompatible with Wikipedia:Etiquette. Considering this refusal is taking place after your opponent proposed to reach a reasonble settlement on several occasions, this is considered as a qualified case of ciber-harassement. A first degree harrasment waring was issued on your talk page.--Bully-Buster-007 11:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What is up with this [4] duplicate warning message? You didn't even give me 24 hours. Your eagerness is forcing me to make up my mind now and I decide to go with the consensus on this one. Sorry. (Requestion 12:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Summary: WorkForAll spam and disruption on Wikipedia

Accounts:

  1. 217.136.84.49 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  2. 217.136.87.32 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  3. 217.136.89.14 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  4. 217.136.93.7 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  5. 217.136.94.66 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  6. 217.136.95.116 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  7. 80.200.64.143 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  8. 80.200.70.132 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  9. 80.200.73.228 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  10. 80.201.177.106 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  11. 80.201.18.252 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  12. 80.201.19.94 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  13. 80.201.213.67 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  14. 80.201.24.135 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  15. 80.201.26.155 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  16. 81.240.150.59 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  17. 81.240.157.210 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  18. 81.241.68.119 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  19. 81.241.68.247 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  20. 81.241.70.243 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  21. 81.241.71.62 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  22. 81.241.74.121 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  23. 81.241.75.18 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  24. 81.242.54.149 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  25. 81.242.58.154 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  26. 81.242.61.227 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  27. 87.244.130.114 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  28. 87.64.93.128 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)
  29. Bully-Buster-007 (talk • contribs • links • count • user logs • user page logs || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search)

These accounts were given multiple warnings regarding spam and personal attacks from multiple editors including:

  1. Requestion
  2. Matteo
  3. Nlu
  4. Kuru
  5. Hu12
  6. ErikWarmelink
  7. Ioannes Pragensis
  8. A. B.
  9. BozMo
  10. Femto

Domain:

Related domains:


References:

English Wikipedia articles edited:

  1. Anarcho-capitalism
  2. Arthur Laffer
  3. Big government
  4. Business cycle
  5. Celtic Tiger
  6. Central bank
  7. Classical liberalism
  8. Data
  9. Data set
  10. Dick Armey
  11. Economic collapse
  12. Economic data
  13. Economic growth
  14. Economic inequality
  15. Economic liberalism
  16. Economic policy
  17. Egalitarianism
  18. Euro
  19. European Central Bank
  20. FairTax
  21. Flat tax
  22. Free market
  23. Friedrich Hayek
  24. Gini coefficient
  25. Great Depression
  26. Great Depression in the United States
  27. Gross domestic product
  28. Hyperinflation
  29. Income
  30. Income inequality metrics
  31. Income redistribution
  32. Inflation
  33. Keynesian economics
  34. Liberalism
  35. Liberalization
  36. List of countries by income equality
  37. Measures of national income and output
  38. Minarchism
  39. Money supply
  40. National Industrial Recovery Act
  41. Neoliberalism
  42. Nicaragua
  43. Poverty
  44. Regression analysis
  45. Scandinavian welfare model
  46. Social model
  47. Statistics
  48. Sustainability
  49. Tax
  50. Taxation in the Republic of Ireland
  51. Time series
  52. Value added tax
  53. Welfare
  54. Welfare economics
  55. Welfare trap


Applicable Wikipedia policies and guidelines:

  1. ""Types of vandalism"" - spam is defined as vandalism
  1. ""Wikipedia is not a soapbox for":
    1. "Propaganda or advocacy of any kind."
    2. "Self-promotion"
    3. "Advertising"
  2. "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files"

--A. B. (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One week block

You have been blocked for one week for issuing inappropriate warning notices. Please try to be constructive. --BozMo talk 14:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has been turned into an indefinite block, this account is closed. Reasons: evading the first block using socks, and the first account being all spam, vandal and trolling with no real contributions to Wikipedia. --BozMo talk 10:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bully-Buster-007&oldid=130235756"