User talk:Anynobody

Archives

Archive - Archive 1 - 04/2007 - 05/2007 - 06/2007

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Sylvia Seegrist

On 13 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sylvia Seegrist, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 00:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Anynobody 04:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was this your first article to be featured in the Did you know? section on the Main Page ? Smee 08:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Unless USS Avocet (AVP-4) was a WP:DYK, then yes it was. I'm more about article improvement than creation I guess. Anynobody 08:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: -- If you wish, you can now utilize the userbox: {{User DYK|1}}, and the number can be adjusted to show number of created articles appeared on DYK, which looks a little something like: {{User DYK}}, (plus the number inserted). You can also utilize the user box {{User Did You Know}}, by inserting {{User Did You Know|Sylvia Seegrist}} on your userpage. Yours, Smee 08:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

User:Anynobody/3RR

A tag has been placed on Anynobody/3RR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6, article mistakenly created in mainspace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 06:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I userfied it to User:Anynobody/3RR. Regards, MaxSem 08:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Anynobody 08:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use of WP:ANI

This is to remind you the uses of WP:ANI:

This page is for reporting and discussing incidents that require the intervention of administrators, such as blocked users evading blocks. Any user of Wikipedia may post here.
Please make your comments civil and please include diffs to help us find the problem you are reporting. As a courtesy, you should inform other users if they are mentioned in a posting. Please make your comments concise. Administrators are less likely to pay attention to long diatribes.

Dispute resolution: This page is not part of our Dispute Resolution process.
If you want to make an open informal complaint about misuse of administrative powers, you can do so here. But this is not the Wikipedia complaints department. If your problem concerns a content issue and does not need the attention of admins, please follow the steps in dispute resolution. These include mediation and requests for comment.

Any further postings to the board, that do not fit exactly withing the criteria, above will be refactored. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jossi, given that I have previously tried WP:DP regarding the WP:ANI issue and it was unresolved where do you recommend taking such concerns? As I said there, it seems to span more than one policy. Going to the group who will be making decisions, administrators, seemed like a logical step. Anynobody 01:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can try WP:MEDCAB or WP:MEDCOM ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jossi, closing the ANI post based on this message is a bit short sited. Remember I was asking about "Is it a personal attack to document an editor's uncivil behavior?", and I asked you to show me in the policies and guidelines where it says not to. Anynobody 07:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the right advice here is to stop beating a dead horse.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would explain why it's dead, and how it died? Anynobody 07:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beating it too much?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, Is it a personal attack to document an editor's uncivil behavior? Anynobody 07:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]