User talk:Fred J

Welcome to my talk page. Place new posts at the foot of the page, please.

Archive1 (February 2005–July 2005), Archive2 (July 2005–March 2006), Archive3 (April–June 2006), Archive4 (June–September, 2006), Archive5 (October-November, 2006) Archive Dec-06 Archive Dec-06 to May-07

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Swedish Krona Old King.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Swedish Krona Old King.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cornelis Vreeswijk, promophoto Metronome Records.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cornelis Vreeswijk, promophoto Metronome Records.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hej

Hej there, Fred, I only just noticed this talkpage had been created, that's how observant I am. Thanks for your good wishes. Bishonen | talk 19:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

LOL, it's just nice you weren't dissing me on purpose. / Fred-Jn 20:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Värmdö Municipality

Hello. I have just noticed you reverted my edits to the Värmdö Municipality article. I believe this was unnecessary, as the sentence I removed was totally unreferenced. The sentence "Today, Värmdö is a rapidly expanding suburban area to Stockholm and also one of the most exclusive areas for summer houses in´Sweden," may be easily challenged, since the IP editor who added the sentence provided no sources for the sentence. I believe I acted correctly by removing the unsourced information, and I see no explanation for your reversion of my edits. Please explain your actions, and I will gladly accept them. Thank you. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 23:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, can't we wait for someone to challenge it before removing it? Or just add a {{fact}}? / Fred-Jn 22:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAC backlog elimination drive

This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 00:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Municipal towns" - a question

Hallo! I am currently working with the municipalities of Sweden. Presently I am writing own articles about the seats (centralorter) as in the Swedish and German WPs. I have a question to you. In some articles about municipalities there are lists of the tätorter in the municipality. They are sometimes called "Municipal towns". I have figured out that you have written some of those lists. A tätort is normally called locality by Statistics Sweden (SCB). Where did you find the term "municipal town"? To me it sounds like some home-spun translation of the swedish term "municipalsamhälle", which was something else. Before I make some large-scale changes of this terminology it would be interesting to know if municipal town really is a term used in English to describe non-administrative buit-up areas like the Swedish concept of tätort. --Muniswede 13:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muniswede.

"Municipal towns" just literally refers to towns of the municipality. If you want to call them localities instead, it's OK -- I don't think it is a big deal.

Fred-Jn 13:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I just wondered if the term had been found in some English language litterature, or if it was an "own" construction. I think "municipal" in this case could be misleading. You mean "in or of the municipality", but it could be interpreted as "towns with a municipal capacity", which they don't have. --Muniswede 20:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, I now understand what you mean. Yes it is bad if it is interpreted in that way. / Fred-Jn 21:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Överkalix_City_Arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Överkalix_City_Arms.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Butseriouslyfolks 06:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ship Districts?!

There are a lot of articles about various "Ship Districts" in Sweden. I think you have written them (as "Mic". On that page I was directed to FredChess. I don´t know for sure if you are all the same. If not, just don't mind my questions!) Questions: Is "Ship District" an accepted term in English for the Swedish word "Skeppslag"? Did you find it somewhere in serious English-language literature on the subject? Or is it just some home-made translation? --Muniswede 21:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Skellefteå City Arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Skellefteå City Arms.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε 22:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Karlstad City Arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Karlstad City Arms.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε 23:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mikael Wiehe single, Det här är ditt land.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mikael Wiehe single, Det här är ditt land.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Perstorp symbol.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Perstorp symbol.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunds ASK (2nd nomination)

Hi, just letting you know that since a second club was given an article, I've added it to the AFD, and I invite your further comment if you so desire. Mister.Manticore 20:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you / Fred-Jn 20:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and I note your edit summary says "vote keep" but I'd like to inform you that AFD discussions are not votes. You may also wish to check WP:ATA and WP:!VOTE. Mister.Manticore 03:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fred. You had two !votes at the Lunds ASK AfD#2, so I line one out so as not to confuse the admin closing the AfD#2. -- Jreferee 22:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ekerö_City_Arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ekerö_City_Arms.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 22:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sävsjö_City_Arms.png

I have tagged Image:Sävsjö_City_Arms.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 20:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Älvdalen_City_Arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Älvdalen_City_Arms.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of Sweden

Hi! You recently reverted me on Economy of Sweden, and I posted a note explaining my rationale on Talk:Economy of Sweden#Figures_section. If you could comment there, it would be appreciated. Thanks! Henrik 08:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hörby City Arms.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hörby City Arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Emperor40k.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Emperor40k.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pak21 10:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We're live

Hi, Fred, we're live, I've emigrated to mainspace. Hope you like it. Bishonen | talk 09:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Östra Göinge City Arms.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Östra Göinge City Arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive

A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.

You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 23:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archbishop_K.G._Hammar,_promophoto_Jim_Elfström,_IKON.jpg

I have tagged Image:Archbishop_K.G._Hammar,_promophoto_Jim_Elfström,_IKON.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. MER-C 09:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Hans Alfredson.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Hans Alfredson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Tjörn_City_Arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tjörn_City_Arms.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Karlstad_Sun.gif

I have tagged Image:Karlstad_Sun.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 15:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also Götene_symbol.gif /Lokal _Profil 22:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gällivare.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gällivare.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Malmö symbol.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Malmö symbol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jusjih 01:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kite picture

Yes, I took that picture. I may be able to dig up the negative. I scanned and uploaded it to en.wikipedia.org years ago when wikipedia didn't keep track of a lot of things and before I started digital photography. Someone else moved it to Common. That is fine with me, but why the original history is lost? Beats me. I am not even a member of the Common. Besides, read near the bottom of my user page and associate me with some alternative identities. I might have done it in my altered ego. Kowloonese 06:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:John Tory Casual.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:John Tory Casual.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Rrburke^(talk) 23:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:John Tory Casual.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:John Tory Casual.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Rrburke^(talk) 16:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

En-6

That's a pretty accurate summary of the TfD debate surrounding the template. I would not be opposed to nominating it again, perhaps the consensus has changed. RyanGerbil10(C-Town) 18:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply.

Fred-J 15:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About File:Jurij Aleksejevič Gagarin (Юрий Алексеевич Гагарин).jpg

Hi, i know you was the man who deleted that image, that image was used in spanish wikipedia for yuri gagarin article's image and result that we doesn't have that image, please can you upload it back because we need it for spanish wikipedia, Thanks.--69.125.75.220 16:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC). Fred please i need that image... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.75.220 (talk) 22:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I trust you but anyway thanks, i had another image for gagarin's article to upload it in spanish wikipedia is the

File:Gagarin space suite.jpg

please can you upload this image for me, i hope to not bother you, Thanks--69.125.75.220 00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]