Jump to content

User talk:151.188.16.20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 151.188.16.20 (talk) at 18:27, 24 October 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~a (usertalkcontribs) 14:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~a (usertalkcontribs) 14:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Minimax, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zvika 08:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

 Netsnipe  ►  21:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during October 9 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Alabama page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. - auburnpilot talk 17:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 22, 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to 4 (number)‎, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Domestic Correction 15:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Quincy Adams, you will be blocked from editing. —Krellis (Talk) 18:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to El Al, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 18:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism from your school after numerous previous blocks. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Will (aka Wimt) 19:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

151.188.16.20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Banning an entire IP for the actions of an idiot few is irrational and detrimental to the rights of those who did not vandalize the pages. Also if an immediate unblocking is not warranted please reduce the ban period, 1 year seems a bit excessive.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Banning an entire IP for the actions of an idiot few is irrational and detrimental to the rights of those who did not vandalize the pages. Also if an immediate unblocking is not warranted please reduce the ban period, 1 year seems a bit excessive. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Banning an entire IP for the actions of an idiot few is irrational and detrimental to the rights of those who did not vandalize the pages. Also if an immediate unblocking is not warranted please reduce the ban period, 1 year seems a bit excessive. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Banning an entire IP for the actions of an idiot few is irrational and detrimental to the rights of those who did not vandalize the pages. Also if an immediate unblocking is not warranted please reduce the ban period, 1 year seems a bit excessive. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}