User talk:GlassCobra
im sorryglasscobra i am so sorry i did not mean to cause anybody harm please forgive me i really did not mean to. please i am begging you to forgive me. your's truely the dork. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.117.204.122 (talk) 00:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC) pleaseare you going to forgive me Glasscobra? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.117.204.122 (talk) 00:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC) QuestionJust making sure, but sometimes I see vandals who are clearly vandalizing and their intent is clearly just to vandalize, but the vandalism is not severe enough to give the "only warning" template. Is it okay to skip some warning levels, for instance skipping level 1 and beginning with a level 2 "caution" warning, or going straight from a level 1 warning to a level 3 warning? I've seen this happen occasionally and I just want to clarify if it is allowed (within reasonable use, of course). Thanks! :) — NovaDog — (contribs) 00:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC) ThankspamLast aired date on Ed, Edd n EddyThis is ridiculous. That field has been edited all day long. Is there any way to block editing a field or infobox without blocking the whole page? It would be a shame to have to protect the page over this one silly field. -- Elaich talk 03:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC) You're everywhere
Ray Charles fixMany thanks for your help. Captmike —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captmike (talk • contribs) 15:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Only a warning?I just felt that if there were ever a case for indef w/o warning, this was it. No biggie, though. If it works, it's all the same, I guess. Regards, K. Scott Bailey 15:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Afternoon :) !Wotcha my man. Yes the might clan McPedro are all fine. How's it going with those shiny new buttons ? Pedro : Chat 16:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Shiny ThingThank you!!! Pedro : Chat 16:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC) HOTTIEI do stand by the close, although you may always take it to DRV if you wish. I'd advise against that: the debate is essentially one of the "this is funny"/"no, it isn't, it's offensive" variety. Numbers are irrelevant once a certain level of opposition is reached: if this page makes a large fraction of the community uncomfortable, keep the peace by moving the page, but retaining the article. If it were merely one or two stragglers or newbies opposing this, that would be one thing -- however, with the number of established voices on both sides, this is the only reasonable outcome. As to its location, I don't care which user has it. I do think it is a bit silly to assert WP:OWNership of the thing, and I'm not sure why you mind in whose userspace it ends up, but you are welcome to work that out with EVula yourself. Best wishes, Xoloz 16:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
CopycatThanks for nailing that little !@#$@#. It's a child whose original username was User:Znznzn, who's been popping up with sockpuppets vandalizing me, Pedro -- he said some disgraceful things about the picture of Pedro's son -- and a couple of other people. I'm about ready to track down his IP and phone his mother... (well, perhaps not yet, but I'm about ready to talk to his service provider). That's one young man that's going to get a spanking when his mom finds out the !@#$# he's been up to. Accounting4Taste 18:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
ThanksFor that revert. I've blocked the IP too; that IP was an IP sock of a person who keeps harassing both me and another user. Acalamari 19:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
how did i vandalize?How did I vandalize? check the artists webpage he is an artist and I added him to the list of Mancini names with a page for his biography which was also deleted. I would appreciate it if you would restore both things that were deleted. Instead of being rude and going ahead and deleting people, perhaps you should do the proactive thing and reach out to a user and try and correct any problems with the posting before deleting pages that they have added. Please clarify —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommiesox (talk • contribs) 20:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC) As you requestedI fixed it. It wasn't closed, so it was including everything else in the page. Also, I moved it to be on the fyi
Please explainPlease explain to me why you blocked my account and delted my last entry. Here's proof from a major reliable source (New Yor Times) that what I said was true: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/15/sports/baseball/15cnd-bonds.html?_r=1&oref=slogin I was on as pnanni —Preceding unsigned comment added by Temporarie2 (talk) 02:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks!--TeaDrinker 05:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Request for Comment about ProblemHi GlassCobra, can you please take a look this discussion in reference to images that were uploaded from WWII in Color website, the copyright status is in question and there have been many users who are part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft who are upset about the Wiki Policy about image licensing WP:IUP. Thank you! -TabooTikiGod 06:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC) RfAI considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 11:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
How do you know cows don't fly?Wisham Beamon is a genius. I happen to know him myself. There is no proof that cows don't fly. Starwarsrulez (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) I have a liable source, it is http://www.space.com/news/moooncow_exhibit_000511.html. Starwarsrulez (talk) 01:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Answ HD QuestionI answered there, but try deleting your cookies. That should do it. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Ultrasound?I am a retired Ultrasonoigrapher. A ct (computed tomography, a slice of a 3D view)presented on a monitor screen. Did you want to know where to get an ultrasound machine repaired? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hlangley1 (talk • contribs)
OverhyperlinkificationI took out the "American" link from RHCP because some Wikipedia articles are so heavily linked that they're near-impossible to read. You put it back with the comment "…but still useful". How so? I can't imagine a reader of that page thinking, "Hmm, 'American'. I wonder what that means?" That way madness lies. Hey ho. Do what you like to RHCP. It's not something to get upset about, but I do wonder whether we overdo the linking sometimes. Patrick Neylan (talk) 00:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC) IRC idling...Damnit - I thought you were online! You should really stop with annoying idling! :PDihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 02:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Minor Jedi AFDOnly a couple of the keep arguments were based in policy or guidelines; the others used arguments like WP:PAPER, WP:SAL (which is just a guideline on how to write standalone lists), and WP:ILIKEIT that aren't reasons to keep anything. The series being notable also doesn't transfer notability to every single character in it (notability isn't inherited), hence my decision to delete. --Coredesat 19:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Future filmsCan I ask you why you are declining the deletion of a number of articles about unproduced projects? The notability guidelines for films clearly reflects that stand-alone articles for such films are not warranted. This is because of the uncertainty of the film industry -- projects are often announced and developed, but a minority of them are actually produced. Is there a reason why such often non-notable items are not deleted? Films with well-covered development histories are placed at broader articles, like Spider-Man 4. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
futonhey glass cobra, hope you're well. just wondering why you've cut the futon wiki page down to a mere discopgraphy? ( your edit on the 14th nov 2007) before there was bit of history about the band etc etc could you let me know please.. cheers jordi (Email address removed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.116.249 (talk • contribs) Yahoo! Groups as external linksHi, Thanks for writng. Sorry that the links were of a bother to you. It seems to me, however, that Wikipedia policy does not just "automatically" ban these types of links. It seems to me that Wikipedia allows the these types of links as long as they are under the following applicable exception (which, they clearly are): "Except for a link to a page that is the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject." Please let me know if you feel these links are not related to "the subject of the article" and, if so, how or why that would be. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AllPeople (talk • contribs) Hey!I want to talk to you on IRC tomorrow... 3 PM sounds fine? nick: eloel Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.192.231 (talk • contribs) You have mailRe: My retirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kscottbailey (talk • contribs) NiceI like how you just broke the RfA talk page. Haha! the_undertow talk 06:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
User_talk:Dihydrogen_Monoxide/Archive/September_2007#User_talk:Giggy - But meh...redirected now... Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 08:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC) ThanksNothing florid, nothing fancy. Just thanks: for the compliments, for the t-shirt, and for the support. I'll try to wield the Mop-and-Bucket with grace and humility. --Orange Mike 04:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC) (do those t-shirts come in orange?) Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC) BackCheers dude. It was positive commments by people like yourself that made me realise I was being churlish. I'm working hard to try to avoid that kind of unfortunate situation again. Thanks for your kind words, they really do mean a lot. Pedro : Chat 14:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC) RE: The Pee Wee Herman vandalHi GlassCobra. Many thanks for that. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Did you block them for what they did in Bongwarrior's userpage?If so, you were mistaken to block that user. He/she even stated that what they were doing was not vandalism. To block a user for anything other than vandalsim is against the policies, not to mention just plain unfair. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC) wikipediaBecause youre all idiots who spend their lives trying to make a piece of crap better instead of getting jobs or going to college. --Malarc77 (talk) 21:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |