Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold edition

Gold edition

Although there are many "gold edition" packages out there, this is an non-notable concept that cannot be verified. In addition, this article also qualifies as advertising and is made entirely out of original research. Marlith ^T/C 05:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, I removed the most ad like paragraph of the article. Marlith ^T/C 05:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per comments at WT:VG. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Merge and redirect - Agree with Guyinblack25 below, thanks for bringing that up. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 06:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect - I'd say integrate whatever is salvageable to Special edition#Video Games or just Special edition. The "Special edition" article is in terrible shape as it is, but is a more general topic that encompasses what "Gold edition" is about. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 05:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Redirect to Special edition as this term is not exclusive to videogames. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 08:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, my "Gold Edition" copy of System Shock 2 didn't come with any expansion pack. I feel ripped off! (oh, and what everyone else said too). Lankiveil (talk) 10:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Delete I don't see how the information contained herein is worth merging. Looks unverifiable to me, whether in the relm of video games or the general sense. -Verdatum (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is patently untrue. Only some gold editions have expansion packs. Some of them are just glossy packages with printed manuals instead of PDFs 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]