Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 December 18

< December 17	December 19 >

December 18

Image:Demartini.jpg

Linked source is an Google image search to re-directs to a fansite that provides no valid source imformation or permissions for use. 156.34.142.110 (talk) 12:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted - the image is already tagged for fair use, so we know it is non-free. I have applied the correct no rationale and replaceable tags. --B (talk) 05:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oldwife Underwing Unspread.jpg

Sourced to website without PD release 140.247.249.16 (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted - The user left a comment at Wikipedia talk:Possibly unfree images/2007 December 18 claiming authorship. The source website credits "Jim Derwin" and the uploader's name is "Jsderwin". I'm inclined to accept this claim of authorship. --B (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seanwiki.jpg

Collage of photos that come from who knows where 140.247.249.16 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this user's dozen or so edits are racist vandalism, including uploading these professional-quality photos and sticking them in unrelated articles with inappropriate caption. 140.247.249.16 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Negro.jpg

Most of this user's dozen or so edits are racist vandalism, including uploading these professional-quality photos and sticking them in unrelated articles with inappropriate caption. 140.247.249.16 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oldwife underwing spread.jpg

Sourced to website w/o PD release 140.247.249.16 (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M_C_Oliver.jpg

Need better evidence to support the GFDL claim. Jusjih (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:450px-Maughanlibrary.jpg

Not sure if the last PD-self statement by 194.74.160.114 is what the uploader means. Jusjih (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ShehoriNYC2CD.jpg

Questionable PD claim. Jusjih (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now has OTRS ticket. MECU≈talk 14:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mordecai_Shehori.1.jpg

Questionable PD claim. Jusjih (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now has OTRS ticket. MECU≈talk 14:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BacktoBasicsOpener.jpg

Has there been any OTRS permission logged as claimed by the uploader? Jusjih (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indfy.jpg

Uploader removed PD-self unexplained. Jusjih (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paolo_gregoletto_trivium_05.jpg

The Flickr source no longer has the photo. Anyway to find historical licensing? Jusjih (talk) 01:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I uploaded it, it was creative commons liscenced with the correct liscense for wikipedia. ≈ Maurauth ^(Ravenor) 12:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mattheafytriviumold.jpg

The Flickr source no longer has the photo. Anyway to find historical licensing? Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LSTs_794_796_843_and_1040.jpg

The external link does not work and it is not fully sure if it qualifies for PD-USnavy. Jusjih (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LST-794.jpg

The external link does not work and it is not fully sure if it qualifies for PD-USnavy. Jusjih (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LST-794_beached.jpg

The external link does not work and it is not fully sure if it qualifies for PD-USnavy. Jusjih (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The_father_fracture_final.JPG

Questionable PD-self claim. Jusjih (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LumaExpandedCover.jpg

Questionable PD claim previously challenged for no fair use rationale. Jusjih (talk) 01:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Old_woman_large.gif

PD-self claim challenged Jusjih (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SXHS,K.jpg

Unclear what the claimed permission is while previously challenged as replaceable fair use. Jusjih (talk) 02:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Permission granted from owner via email. Unsure how to provide evidence on Wikipedia Quork (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:COPYREQ and WP:OTRS. You can not claim fair use if you get permission. You need to get a free license or we cannot accept this image. MECU≈talk 14:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Petra Verkaik painting.png

Derivative work from a MacAndBumble.com image. original. Others from same uploader also appear derivative. --StarGeek (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:06rl.jpg

Claims own work, but looks like a promo shot. Liftarn (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found at infocoches.com, thecarconnection.com, netcarshow.com and conceptcarz.com. This also applies to Image:07h.jpg (found at cars.com, autobytel.com, Optimum Autos, luxurymotors.com, Cars Direct and cars-plus.info) and Image:04rl.jpg (see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:04rl.jpg). Given these as well as Image:PS11012.jpg and the other images listed below, I personally do not find any of the uploader's copyright claims to be credible. I would appreciate if this matter could be handled speedily so that we don't have to duplicate more of the process at Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PS11012.jpg

Claims both own work and "Photo from Bonneville Club Photo Catalog". Liftarn (talk) 11:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to Image:93se.jpg, Image:93sle.jpg, Image:94ssei.jpg, Image:97sle.jpg, Image:98sse.jpg, Image:IMG 2134.jpg, Image:03sle.jpg, Image:01SSEi.jpg, and Image:04gxp.jpg. The uploader is the same as for Image:06rl.jpg listed above. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:W900 offlaying2.jpg

Claims own work, but is watermarked "Unofficial Club Sony Ericsson". Liftarn (talk) 11:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Outside Group BW.jpg

Description is ambiguous as to whether he took it himself or downloaded it from his school's website. I doubt he took all these himself. Mangostar (talk) 12:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating

for the same reason. Mangostar (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Outside2.gif

Sourced to a now-dead website, doubtful that the uploader created it Mangostar (talk) 13:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SeongCheol.JPG

GFDL license appears unlikely B (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol with Cheongdam.jpg

No reason to believe image is available under GFDL - source website has a copyright, all rights reserved message. From the article, this image is from the WWII era, so it is theoretically possible that it is PD - the PRC uses life+50 for individual works and 50 years from publication for corporate works, so if we had more context, it may be that this image is PD B (talk) 15:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol Gayasan.jpg

Image:Seongcheol as a young man.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission, as with one of the above, this one may be PD by age. The image was taken in the early 1930s. B (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol Hundred Day Lecture.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol pagoda.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol hwadu flax.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dongsan monk.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol do not deceive.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol Hundred pack.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol robe.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seongcheol Sunlim.jpg

No evidence of GFDL permission B (talk) 15:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Topfree111.jpg

Image looks professional, and uploader has uploaded copyvios in the past that he claimed were his own. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 16:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael_Phelps.JPEG.jpg

Looks like a copyvio, image from a new account – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 17:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trisha krishnan.jpg

Image is listed as self-made, but it's unusual for someone to request a free image just a few days before contributing one of their own. This photo and ones from the same shoot are sprinkled across the web. [1] [2] [3] [4] ×Meegs 18:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Refuel2.gif

Appears to be a non-free image that serves the same purpose as which is considered copyright-free. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ovipositingslits.jpg

says both copyright and pd, copyright holder doesn't have same name as uploader Mangostar (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Owsleysunshine.jpg

obviously a publicity shot Mangostar (talk) 20:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Owwsports.JPG

says both copyright and PD Mangostar (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oxford-college-of-engineering.jpg

taken by uploader's friend, no explicit release Mangostar (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OutdoorUPSSystem.jpg

says it's self-taken, but there are lots of photos of similar systems on the internet in a suspiciously similar style. i couldn't track this particular one down though. Mangostar (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OutdoorUPS2.JPG

says it's self-taken, but there are lots of photos of similar systems on the internet in a suspiciously similar style. i couldn't track this particular one down though. Mangostar (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Luton6thlogo.gif

No clear explanation of fair use. It will by mainly seen in the UK, so notice about fair use in USA might not be relevant. Snowman (talk) 22:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DemiMoore.jpg

this user has been uploading all sorts of professional phtoographs and tagging them PD-self (can someone else go thru the logs and post those here?) Mangostar (talk) 00:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]