User talk:Cometstyles
- currently retired
Cometstyles Discussion Page | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welcome
Archives
MessageCheck your e-mail, please. I'd appreciate if you responded there, as well. Thanks. -- RG2 01:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) RfA thanksOrphaned non-free media (Image:Highlanders 1.jpg)Thanks for uploading Image:Highlanders 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Your comment on Kmweber's RfA !voteYou should be aware that your comment on Kurt's oppose could easily be construed as a personal attack. Additionally, you might also like to know that not only does ArbCom not want to restrain Kurt - the same opinion is overwhelmingly expressed in both RfCs regarding his conduct. The community disagrees with you, and the vehemence of your comment is absolutely unwarranted. Avruchtalk 16:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC) RfA thanksDear Cometstyles, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6). Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators. Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC) League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 17:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Smile (Wow....this is an "original" headline)Tiptoety talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Happy New Year!Thank you for your clear and polite explanation of why my userpage was not acceptable. Please inform ClanCC of your methods before he is reported. I am new to Wikipedia and do not know how to get things onto my userpage like most other people do, so I use copy and paste, but only wanted the checkmark icon, not the entire text. Thank you. -FranklinPierce3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franklinpierce3 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry but...I don't particularly agree with your reasoning to oppose Keilana's RfA, I'm not saying that there is no reason to oppose, but the way you worded it really, really bothers me. Her reasoning[1] for setting up a recall for herself were per these.[2][3] --Charitwo talk 19:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Unified Login on April 1stBarnstar!moved to userpage
Hello. I wish to nominated the article Orion (constellation) to be semi-protected because of the extreme number of anonymous vandals editing that article. Considering it's a high profile article, an article children would be likely to look up, the detrimental effects of the vandalism to how Wikipedia looks as a whole, and the proportion that most edits are vandalism and reversions, I think semi-protection against anonymous users would be appropriate. Since the process requires a consensus on the article's talk page and you are one of the registered users who have reverted vandalism recently, I am writing in the hopes that you will go to the talk page and agree to the semi-protection. If we can get a convincing consensus, we can continue the process to the next step. Thanks for your time. --Bark (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC) greetings!...any particular reason you reverted my edit to the Tale Spin page? also, I'm a completely different person than whomever is editing "Westdale Mall" and that sort - check out my IP's "talk" page. Unfortunately, I'm at a shared network, and somebody else is doing the unsatisfactory edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.199.226.117 (talk) 17:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Rena SilvermanSorry, I reverted it myself but you got there first. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
ArticleYep: front page news as well (seriously!). There are a few factual errors in the article unfortunately, but it's good overall. It looks like the two recent comments about the article were left by a user who is banned here. Acalamari 21:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Gwen Stefani genresCan you please block the user vandalizing Stefani's genres?? Everyday this user does the same thing. Charmed36 (talk) 22:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfAHey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 20:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Highlanders (rugby) peer reviewHey. I've been struggling to get any comments at my requested peer-review of Highlanders (rugby). I was wondering if you would be able to spend a few minutes reading through the article and adding any comments or suggestions here? Thanks. - Shudde talk 06:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC) My talk pageThanks a lot for removing [[4]] from my talk page. It feels good to know that fellow Wikipedians will watch your back and will defend you against attacks from vandals. You've brightened up my day, so thanks again. :-) Koert van der Veer (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Revert while I was {inuse}why? AndyJones (talk) 13:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Electronics and Communication EngineeringI was removing things that didn't make sense. I mean what is the deal with having "Notable Alumni" on that page? Some pranksters have just written their names in that section. Plus why is the "Three Year Diploma" section there? The whole page seems very random. Please let me make it better. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.78.2 (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Ukrainian information of Volodymyr NechyporukHi Cometstyles, Do you think that adding any Ukrainian information is a kind of destructive action? If the answer is also negative, I'll re-recover the reversion of 140.112.30.84 (22:20, 22 January 2008) because the article Нечипорук Володимир Павлович is still with its English version. Apologies for inconvenience. Sincerely, The revisioner, 10:22 23 January 2008 (GMT)
The Guitar Hero article is clearly vandalism. Hitler is listed as one of the authors! That is criteria for speedy deletion, my nomination stands. Please do not undo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbsimpson (talk • contribs) 12:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Guitar HeroMuch better, I didn't see a better previous version, but the one that was up there was ridiculous. Listing "Satan/Hitler with the help of Mickey Mouse" as the developers and other junk like that. Thanks.--Cbsimpson (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Oops...I accidentally removed the speedy tag during a revert with which I hoped to return the article to the salable version that it never had. Thanks for replacing it. --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 12:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 82.109.167.130Good to see you fighting the good fight. He's on WP:AIV now, though - it's usually better just to take a slow revert stance and revert it all an hour later, than to waste your own time and effort with a back-and-forth revert war (which also takes up space in the page history). A lot of these are just kids in their hour-long computer class. --McGeddon (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC) SorryHey Sorry dude. I had no wrong Intentions in deleting the Sanskrit Article. I used to hear that Wikipedia reverts vandalism is less than a minute. Just wanted to check that. Thats it :-). I am really sorry for my action. Sorry Again 121.247.80.149 (talk) 12:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |