Jump to content

Martin Garbus

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Martingarbus (talk | contribs) at 16:02, 23 January 2008 (→CLIENTS AND COMPANIES REPRESENTED). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Martin Garbus (born 1934) is an American attorney who is expert in trial law. He has tried cases throughout the country involving constitutional, criminal, copyright, and intellectual property law. He has appeared before the United States Supreme Court as well as trial and appellate courts throughout the nation. He has written numerous briefs that have been submitted to the United States Supreme Court; a number of which have resulted in changes in the law on a nationwide basis. He is the author of six books and over 50 articles.

PERSONAL

Martin Garbus graduated from the Bronx High School of Science in 1951. He earned his undergraduate degree at Hunter College in 1955 and his Juris Doctor from New York University Law School. He thereafter attended Columbia University as a Master’s Candidate in economics, at the New School as a Master’s Candidate in English and at New York University Law School as a Master’s Candidate in tax law. He wrote for the New York University Law Review. He was admitted to the United States Supreme Court Bar in 1963.


UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASES INCLUDE

  • Mr. Garbus filed what is arguably the most important due process case of the 20th century, Goldberg v. Kelly (397 U.S. 254), a successful 5-4 due process decision.
  • Arguing in the United States Supreme Court after a trial in Alabama, Mr. Garbus won, in King v. Smith (392 U.S. 309), a unanimous 9-0 decision striking down laws in 14 states on the grounds they violated the Constitution. These laws had disenfranchised one million people.
  • Served as co-counsel in Ashton v. Kentucky (384 U.S. 195), a Supreme Court decision that struck down all criminal libel laws in the United States
  • Served as co-counsel in Jacobellis v. Ohio (378 U.S. 184), where the Supreme Court held unconstitutional an Ohio statute seeking to regulate motion pictures and, for the first time, defined the term “national community standards.”

QUOTES ABOUT MARTIN GARBUS

The Guardian(1) called him “one of the world’s finest trial lawyers” and the “founding partner of one of America’s most prestigious law firms” (The Guardian, April 16, 1992). In 2007, Business Week (2) called him "legendary," “a ferocious lawyer who has received numerous media citations as one of America’s leading trial lawyers” and a "ferocious litigator;" Time Magazine (3) named him "legendary, one of the best trial lawyers in the country." Fortune Magazine (4) called him, "One of the nation's premier First Amendment attorneys," and "legendary," Reuters (5) called him a “famed lawyer” while other media have called him "America's most prominent First Amendment lawyer" with an "extraordinarily diverse practice" and "one of the country's top ten litigators." Super Lawyers Magazine (6) . designated him as a “Superlawyer.” New York Magazine (7) and Los Angeles Magazine, over the last twelve years have named him both as one of America’s best trial lawyers, and one of America’s best intellectual property lawyers.


Source - 

 1.The Guardian, April 16, 1992.
 2. Business Week, April 20, 2007.
 3. Time, May 2, 2007.
 4. Fortune, May 2, 2007.
 5. Reuters, August 2007.
 6. Superlawyers Manhattan Edition, June 2006.
 7. New York Magazine, March 20, 1995.

CLIENTS AND COMPANIES REPRESENTED

Mr. Garbus' diverse practice as an entertainment lawyer consists of individuals and companies involved in media, entertainment and the arts. He has handled entertainment law cases involving free speech, intellectual property, and commercial law issues. His clients include:

  • Authors: [David Halberstam, [Philip Roth, [Tom Brokaw, [Amy Tan, [Terry McMillan], [Peter Matthiessen], [Nancy Reagan], and [Kai Bird] and [Martin Sherwin].
  • Actors, Playwrights, Directors, & Producers:

[Al Pacino], [Lauren Bacall], [Martin Lawrence], [Sean Connery], [Michael Caine], [Richard Gere], [Robert Redford], [Penny Marshall], [Spike Lee], [Michael Moore], [Garry Marshall], [Sidney Lumet], [Samuel Beckett], [Peter Stone] and Athol Fugard.

  • Nobel Prize Winners: [Nelson Mandela, [Vaclav Havel and [James Watson.
  • Publishers: [Penguin-Putnam Books, [Farrar, Straus & Giroux, [Simon & Schuster, [Random House], [Alfred A. Knopf], [Pantheon, [Ballantine Books], [Grove Press] and [Scholastic Books].
  • Other individual clients include [Reggie Jackson], [Don Imus], [Daniel Ellsberg], [Alger Hiss] and the [Ronald Reagan] Alzheimer’s Foundation.
  • Artists, Photographers & Galleries:

Agnes Martin, Tom Wesselman, Sally Mann, [Bert Stern], [Richard Avedon], Robert Frank, and The Pace Gallery.

  • Motion Picture Studios, Media & Corporate Entities:

Corporate litigation for [Twentieth Century Fox], [Janus Films], [Warner Brothers], [Miramax], [Weinstein Films], [LucasFilms], Paramount, [Michael Bloomberg] and Bloomberg, L.P.

Among the many litigations involving high-profile individuals that Mr. Garbus has handled:

  • Representation of Bloomberg LLP, the company owned by the now Mayor of the City of New York, against Rupert Murdoch
  • Represented Don Imus in a lawsuit against CBS
  • Represented a French composer I n a copyright suit against the singer Eminem and Universal
  • Represented Robert Tine and a publishing house to help establish the claim that it is very difficult to prove libel in fiction
  • Represented Penguin and Peter Matthiessen in South Dakota and Minnesota in defending libel suits brought by William Janklow, the governor of the State of South Dakota and David Price of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
  • Defense of actor Richard Gere against criminal assault charges
  • Defense of Donald Trump against libel charges
  • Represented Richard Avedon, renowned photographer, against invasion of privacy claims
  • Represented Viking Penguin in a suit against the government that tried to stop a book written by Jeffrey Toobin against Iran-Contra
  • Represented Robert Redford in a false advertising suit against the Lorillard Tobacco Company
  • Represented a San Francisco journalist who refused to give information about anti-Bush demonstrations
  • Represented LucasFilms in the corporate litigation of its book negotiations for Star Wars."
  • Represented author Robert Sam Anson, who claimed Disney tried to block a book critical of its management


THE INTERNET

  • Represented the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Open Source

Movement in the first copyright case to be tried under the new Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That landmark case, involving the motion picture industry and the MPAA, became the battleground where First Amendment and copyright/intellectual property values clashed, permanently affecting the art, movie, music and DVD industry, including the rights of MP3 and iPod owners. It helped lead to changes in the way music and movies are sold. In other Internet law cases, he successfully represented Internet defendants, including AOL, in copyright, libel and criminal suits.

ESTATE MATTERS

  • Numerous complex estate cases in New York and been appointed to serve as lawyer and/or executor and/or trustee of numerous estates
  • Represented the Stravinsky estate in a preceding-setting suit interpreting the late author's will and the disposition of hundreds of millions of dollars of royalties
  • Represented the Mitchell Estate in a case involving a parody of

the novel, "Gone With the Wind", titled The Wind Done Gone

  • Successfully represented Grove Press and Pia Pera, author of

"Lo's Diary," in a suit brought by the Estate of Vladimir Nabokov to block publication of her novel

  • Successfully represented, in a Los Angeles federal court, well-known Hollywood personalities defrauded of hundreds of millions of

dollars by business managers and agents

  • Represented in New York and New Mexico two substantial estates

involving control and value over significant works of art

  • Represented art donors in valuation proceedings before the IRS

and in tax court

County, on breach of contract claims by Russian oligarchs, and in California and Texas on breach of contract claims

CRIMINAL DEFENSE

  • In Nebraska and South Dakota, he successfully represented Wounded Knee murder defendants, a leading scientist against a claim by one of America's largest corporations that he stole secret computer codes, white-collar defendants, defendants in military court martial cases against various charges, as well as 14 cases of murder in New York.

CIVIL RIGHTS, FREE SPEECH, AND OTHER FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUES

Workers Union on criminal charges in Delano, California, Florida and Texas

  • Defended employees of Mobilization for Youth brought before the

New York State Senate HUAC committee

  • Defended civil rights workers, lawyers and voters in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas on criminal charges
  • Co-directed "Operation Southern Justice" to integrate criminal and

civil juries in the South

  • Defended opponents of the Vietnam and Iraq wars and supporters of

the Civil Rights movement throughout the country

PUBLIC SPEAKING:

Mr. Garbus has participated in lectures and debates before the American Bar Association, the Bar Associations of New York, Washington and Los Angeles. Mr. Garbus debated former Independent Prosecutor Kenneth Starr at venues across the country. He served as a commentator for NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, Fox News, Court TV, Time and Newsweek. Martin Garbus has been a commentator at the Huffington Post

SELECTED WRITINGS BY MARTIN GARBUS

  • The Roberts Court's Dramatic Rightward Shift - New York Times - July 10, 2006
  • China: A Consistent Commitment To The Rule Of Intellectual Property and Corporate Law - China Corporate Counsel- Part I, Page 1, June 2006
  • China: A Consistent Commitment To The Rule Of Intellectual Property and Corporate Law - China Corporate Counsel- Part II, Page 8 - July 2006
  • The Barry Bonds Case from the New York Times, The Inquirer, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, & other papers - 2006
  • A Hostile Takeover, The American Prospect, March 1, 2003
  • Lolita and the Lawyers, Bookend: The New York Times Sunday Book Review, November 4, 2002
  • The Integrity of Copyright, Media Law & Policy (New York Law School), Spring 2002
  • I'm Proud to be a Lawyer! The Legal Issues in The Attempt to Impeach Clinton, My Observer, December 11, 2000
  • Supreme Court to Press: Drop Dead, Washington Post, July 12, 2000
  • A Senate Conviction Could Be Overturned, New York Times, Jan. 8, 1999
  • Annual Survey of American Law: Keynote Address, State of the Union for the Law of the new Millennium, the Internet and the First Amendment, New York University School of Law, 1999 Volume, Issue 2 (Fall 1999)
  • Crime and Publishing: 'Son of Sam' laws are opposed to real First Amendment Interests and must be struck down, Publishers Weekly, May 13, 1999
  • The Judicial Branch Has Obligations, Too, New York Times, January 8, 1999
  • The Lawyer's Bookshelf: Deliberate Intent: A Lawyer Tells the True Story of Murder by the Book (book review), New York Law Journal, Sept. 14, 1999
  • The Lawyer's Bookshelf: Don't Shoot the Messenger: How Our Growing Hatred of the Media Threatens Free Speech for All of Us (book review), New York Law Journal, Oct. 26, 1999
  • Law Courts Make Lousy Art Critics, New York Forum, Los Angeles Times, September 4, 1998
  • The Indecent Standard, The Nation, April 13, 1998
  • The Lawyer's Bookshelf: High Crimes and misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton (book review), New York Law Journal, Sept. 4, 1998
  • Private Censorship, New York Law Journal, Dec. 1, 1997
  • Recalling The Papers and the Papers, National Law Journal, July 15, 1996
  • First, Give Rwanda Aid, New York Times, April 29, 1995
  • Let's Do Away With 'Son of Sam' Laws, New York Law Journal, March 31, 1995
  • Let's Do Away with 'Son of Sam' Laws, Publishers Weekly, February 13, 1995
  • Jurists Without Borders, New York Times, Nov. 17, 1994
  • Law review: It's OK to criticize as long as long as it's positive,

Daily Variety, April 11, 1994

  • My Mother, Book Reviews and the First Amendment, Publishers Weekly, April 25 1994
  • Thumper Rabbit to Replace Siskel and Ebert, New York Newsday, March 10, 1994
  • Who Owns Electronic Rights in the New Media?, New York Law Journal, Dec. 23, 1994
  • The Attack on I.F. Stone: An Exchange, New York Review of Books, Dec. 3, 1992
  • The Lawyer's Bookshelf: The FBI/s War on Freedom of Expression, New York Law Journal, April 1, 1992
  • In at the Birth of a New Constitution, Columbia Journalism Review, Nov./Dec. 1991
  • Libel Case Ruling Will Haunt Publishing World, New York Times, June 28, 1991
  • Will the 'Cheever' Case Affect Other Author/Publisher Relationships?, New York Law Journal, Aug. 6, 1991
  • With Malice Toward None, The Nation, Oct. 28, 1991
  • New Finale Would Appall Beckett, New York Times, March 23, 1990
  • Thornburgh's Morality Brigade, New York Times, April 28, 1990
  • Limiting Our Rights: New Supreme Court Decisions Hit Hard at First Amendment Freedoms, Publishers Weekly, August 18, 1989
  • Outside Counsel Column, New York Law Journal, Nov. 8, 1989
  • Supreme Court's Recent Libel Law Rulings Impairing Media's Rights Under 'Sullivan,' New York Law Journal, Sept. 5, 1989
  • Taiwan Rigs Its Election, New York Times, Dec. 2, 1989
  • Was Major Alley A Scapegoat? A Soldier's Disgrace by Don J. Snyder (book review), Los Angeles Times, Sept. 27, 1989
  • The Media Under Siege, Washington Post, Aug. 4, 1989
  • Who Will Defend Our Right to Read? Government Agencies Must Be Prepared to Move Forcefully to Protect Booksellers, Los Angeles Times, March 5, 1989
  • A Travesty of Libel, New York Law Journal, Sept. 26, 1989
  • An Unofficial Secrets Act?, New York Times, Nov. 8, 1988
  • Israel's Military-Injustice System, New York Times, Jan. 26, 1988
  • Allowing Publication of a Journal, New York Times, July 23, 1987
  • The Many Costs of Libel, Publishers Weekly, Sept. 5, 1986
  • Set a Standard, New York Times, Feb. 19, 1986
  • Lawyers Should Not Testify Against Clients, New York Times, December 16, 1985
  • The D.A. Errs in the Goetz Case, New York Magazine, Feb. 2, 1985
  • Excluding Justice, New York Times, April 4, 1983
  • The Limits for Libel, New York Times Sunday Magazine, July 29, 1983
  • South Africa: The Death of Justice, New York Review of Books, Aug. 4, 1977
  • South African Justice, New York Review of Books, Sept. 15, 1977
  • Speech & Power: Is First Amendment Absolutism Obsolete?, The Nation, July 21, 1997
  • New Mag in Moscow, New York Review of Books, Aug. 13, 1987
  • Of 2 South African Trials ('Facades'), New York Times, July 20, 1977
  • Two South African Trials - August 1977
  • An Observer's Report - August 1977
  • The Case Against Perry Mason, New York Times, Dec. 28, 1975
  • On Trial in Chile, New York Times, Aug. 8, 1974
  • A Lawyer's Thoughts - Nixon should be disbarred, New York Times, May 28, 1973
  • Now Less Protection for the Compelled Witness, New York Times, May 28, 1972
  • In Defense of Chavez, New York Times, Jan. 12, 1972
  • The Problem of the 'Dynamite' Charge, New York Times, Oct. 8, 1972
  • The Right to Break the Law, New York Times, June 18, 1972

SELECTED ARTICLES ABOUT MARTIN GARBUS, CASES AND BOOKS

  • "Blogger Makes Deal, Is Released From Jail" - Washington Post, April 4, 2007
  • "Canceled by Principal, Student Play Heads to Off Broadway" - The New York Times, April 12, 2007
  • "Q&A: Martin Garbus Media Litigator and MPAA Ratings Critic" - The Hollywood Reporter, Esq., February 20-26, 2007
  • "Insider Novels Push the Envelope" - USA Today, April 9, 2007

Super Lawyer - 2006

  • "Is Your Stuff Yours? The Answer Isn't So Simple" - Los Angeles Times, February 21, 2005
  • "Perspective: 'Takings Clause' at Issue," New York Law Journal, February 23, 2005
  • "He Globetrots to Fight Oppression, The New York Newsday Interview with Martin Garbus, New York Newsday, January 3, 2004
  • "Martin Garbus, Defender of the Damned, by Betsy L. Freund, The Guardian (London), February 5, 2004
  • 'Garbus, Martin, by [C.L.], Washington Post, September 12, 2003
  • "Martin Garbus, Author of 'Courting Disaster,' on the Estrada Nomination, a Buzzflash Interview, Buzzflash.com, March 15, 2003
  • "A Veteran Liberal Trial Lawyer's View of the High Court, A Review of Attorney Martin Garbus' Courting Disaster, WritNews FindLaw's Book Review, November 15, 2002
  • "Courting Disaster, Lawyer's Bookshelf, New York Law Journal, September 12, 2002
  • "Dismantling the Law, by Robert H. Bork, The New Criterion. Vol. 21, No.3, November 2002
  • "From Our Editors/From the Publisher/From the Critics, Comments listed with listing on Barnes & Noble website for Courting Disaster: The Supreme Court and the Unmaking of American Law, Pub. Date September 2002
  • "The Lawyer and the 'Rape Hoax,' by Nat Hentoff, Washington Post, May 13, 2002
  • "Is the High Court Too High and Mighty?, Review of Courting Disaster and the Unmaking of American Law, Business Week, October 21, 2002
  • "Down by Law: When Movie Moguls Wage War to Protect Copyright, the First Amendment Ends Up on the Cutting Room Floor, by Jeff Howe, Village Voice, May, 9, 2000
  • "Hollywood vs. the Hacker, by Hillary Rosner, New York Magazine, October 23, 2000
  • "Susan Sontag Gets Jumpy; Pat Conroy Gets Left Out, by Elizabeth Manus, New York Observer, January 17, 2000
  • "The Press: Unreasonable Doubt, by M.A. Farber, Vanity Fair, October 1995
  • "Bully for the Right Guys, by Playthell Benjamin, The Guardian (London), April 16, 1992
  • "New York Courts Deal Blow to Claims of Libel in Fiction, New York Law Journal, May 7, 1991
  • "Expletive Included, by Eric Alterman, Review of Tough Talk: How I Fought for Writers, Comics, Bigots, and the American Way, The New York Times, August 9, 1988
  • "From the Publisher/From the Critics, Comments listed with listing on Barnes & Noble website, for Tough Talk, Pub. Date July 1988.
  • "Tales of the First Amendment, a review of Tough Talk, by Seth Bloom, Miami Herald, October 1988
  • "From the Critics, Comments listed with listing on Barnes & Noble website for Traitors and Heroes: A Lawyer's Memoir, Pub. Date June 1987
  • "The Best Lawyers in New York, New York Magazine, March 20, 1995
  • "Traitors & Heroes: A Lawyer's Memoir, Reviewed by William Blum, The Los Angeles Times, The Book Review, July 26, 1987

INTERNATIONAL WORK

Martin Garbus has worked for the governments of the former Soviet Union , Czechoslovakia , Poland , China, Canada and Hungary as a consultant on constitutional, media and communications law. Recently, the government of China hired Mr. Garbus to help address the problems posed by digital piracy. He represented dissidents Vaclav Havel , Nelson Mandela and Andrei Sakharov. In 2004, he was appointed advisor to the Chinese team responsible for the creation of China's intellectual property laws.

REVIEW OF BOOKS BY MARTIN GARBUS

  • "The Next 25 Years: How the Supreme Court Will Make You Forget the Meaning of Words Like Privacy, Equality and Freedom

"Garbus cuts right to the heart of what's at stake, including rights to abortion, privacy and religion; states' sovereignty issues; tax reform and others. With crystal-clear reasoning, Garbus sounds a wake-up call for those suspicious of the current administration's long-term plans for the U.S. judiciary." - Publishers Weekly. “An ardent defender of freedom, Martin Garbus reminds us that the Supreme Court directly affects the lives of all Americans. In the last half century, the Court has played a central role in the effort to make America a better and fairer land . . . . Garbus alerts us to what he sees as the current Court’s undoing of much of that important work.” – Senator Edward M. Kennedy “Mr. Garbus . . . argues that the ideological lock put on our federal court system in the past thirty years by the Republican right wing constitutes a clear and present danger to the basic legal and moral assumptions of a modern democratic republic. He lays out the evidence . . . and his case is sound. This work ought to be read by every voter in the country.” – E.L. Doctorow “Martin Garbus’ grasp of the importance of what is now happening to one of the greatest legal institutions in the world – the Supreme Court – is brilliantly demonstrated in this analysis. Martin is recognized internationally as one of the great legal constitutional voices of the US. He knows from raw experience why an independent Supreme Court is a crucial check on the Executive and is fundamental to liberty. He has inspired lawyers around the world and helped us develop our own antennae for threats to human rights.” - Lady Helena Kennedy, member of the House of Lords in the British Parliament and author of Just Law: The Changing Face of Justice and Why it Matters

  • "Courting Disaster: The Supreme Court and the Unmaking of America Law (Times Books, New York, 2002; Times Books softcover, 2003). The Washington Post called it "a vigorous book, full of passion."

“Courting Disaster is like a firebell in the night. The Supreme Court has the power to shape the national future; and Martin Garbus’ lucid and perceptive analysis of cases and personalities tells us where the Court might go. No one will be able to say that we haven’t been warned.” - Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr' “In this important book, Martin Garbus tells the story of a torrent of right-wing judicial activism and what it means for the average American. This is a compelling portrait of judicial hubris and a revolution gone wrong.” - Jack M. Balkin, Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment, Yale Law School “Mr. Garbus’s brilliant book argues that the ideological lock put on our federal court system in the past thirty years by the Republic right wing constitutes a clear and present danger to the basic legal and moral assumptions of a modern democratic republic. He lays out the evidence, all the way up to the Supreme Court, and his case is sound. This work ought to be read by every voter in the country.” - E.L. Doctorow “Martin Garbus has written a forceful, highly readable assault on the current Court that some readers will find fascinating, others infuriating, but none boring.” - Tinsley Yarbrough, Author of The Rehnquist Court and the Constitution “Martin Garbus is one of America’s most renowned defenders of the First Amendment. Courting Disaster, his lucid and spirited critique of the conservative judiciary of our time, is a powerful argument for the dangers that the judicial activism of the present Supreme Court poses to civil liberties.” - Alan Brinkley, Allan Nevins Professor of History, Columbia University

  • "Tough Talk: How I Fought For Writers, Comics, Bigots, and the American Way, introduction by David Halberstam (Random House-Times Books, 1998, Times Books softcover, 1999)

“Martin Garbus reminds us why the First Amendment comes first in the Bill of Rights. This powerful book retells what our founding fathers understood – that freedom cannot survive by silencing dissent. A free marketplace of ideas is the indispensable condition of a thriving democracy.” - Senator Ted Kennedy “Martin Garbus has written a kind of First Amendment war journal, with free speech the turf, the treasure and the prize. It’s filled with courtroom gladiators, villains, and surprises about good guys and bad guys, and how they change history.” - Diane Sawyer, ABC News “If anyone – journalist or otherwise – has any doubts, qualms, or second thoughts about everyone’s right to speak his mind, get them to read this book. - Morley Safer, 60 Minutes. “A memoir so engaging that one wishes it were longer.” - Kirkus Reviews

  • "Traitors and Heroes (Athenaeum, 1987; Random House softcover, 1988)

"A forthright, impassioned, informative and chilling memoir" by the New York Times ; it describes Mr. Garbus's legal work in the Soviet Union, Chile and South Africa. The New York Times designated it a notable book and called it "A forthright, impassioned, informative and chilling memoir." The Los Angeles Times named it a notable book, and their reviewer called it "a superb book." "Traitors and Heroes provides searing examples of injustice done in the name of law, from South Africa to the Soviet Union. Martin Garbus experienced firsthand the emotions – the frustrations – of a lawyer in those appalling circumstances. He makes us share his feelings.” - Anthony Lewis

  • "Ready for the Defense (Farrar Straus & Giroux, 1971; Avon softcover, 1972, and Carroll & Graf reprint, 1995)

Described by Herbert Mitgang in the New York Times as "a gripping account of five of Martin Garbus' dramatic trials all the suspense and excitement of first-rate courtroom dramas leav[ing] few emotions untapped.” The book was a New York Times Notable Book. "The way things are going, I may be the subject of prosecution. Assuming I am of sound mind, I hereby chose as attorney for my defense Martin Garbus. Garbus draws on experience as a trial lawyer in criminal defense, corporate litigation, estates and class action suits. His cases, recounted in this book, are Darrowesque." - Studs Terkel “Martin Garbus writes like he just had breakfast with Tom Paine and lunch with Madison. He is a lawyer who pushes the frontier of freedom forward by defending the damned in places where liberty doesn't exist. And then describing the experience with the clear, piercing logic of a post-1984 Orwell.” - Jack Newfield “We need more advocates of free speech like Martin Garbus.” - William Safire “Lawyers who care about human and civil rights more than property rights are few; lawyers who can write are fewer. Traitors and Heroes is a lawyer’s memoir, but one would hardly know that for it is also a humanist’s memoir, a writer’s memoir, an activist’s memoir. Martin Garbus is an artist of advocacy.” - Victor Navasky, Editor, The Nation

  • "China Journal: China 1972-2008

Martin Garbus, reflecting on his time spent teaching copyright law in China, recounts the personal narratives of individual Chinese people in their struggles for justice. Court cases he examines involve free speech, dissent, copyright law, intellectual property, and most importantly, the rule of law. To be published in November 2008.

TELEVISION INTERVIEWS WITH MARTIN GARBUS

“60 Minutes,” “MacNeill Lehrer Report,” “Good Morning America,” “Good Day New York,” Tom Brokaw, Charlie Rose, Catherine Crier, Peter Jennings, Brian Wilson, Diane Sawyer, Mike Wallace, Dan Rather, Bill O’Reilly and others. Jon Stewart (Comedy Central)

FILMS IN WHICH MR. GARBUS APPEARS

  • “Pretty Woman,” directed by Garry Marshall
  • “The Runaway Bride” directed by Garry Marshall
  • “Dear God,” directed by Garry Marshall
  • “The Ruling Class,” directed by Lewis Lapham
  • “This Movie is Not Rated,” directed by Kirby Dick discussing the Motion Picture Association film code
  • “Lenny Bruce: Swear to Tell the Truth,” directed by Robert Weide
  • “Frankie and Johnny, “ starring Al Pacino and Michelle Pfeiffer
  • "No Joking," a film directed by Bob Balaban (2004)

LIST OF CASES

Lewis v. Martin, No. 829, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 552; 90 S. Ct. 1282; 25 L. Ed. 2d 561; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 48, March 3-4, 1970, Argued, April 20, 1970, Decided

Rosado v. Wyman, No. 540, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 397; 90 S. Ct. 1207; 25 L. Ed. 2d 442; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 53; 13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 375, November 19, 1969, Argued, April 6, 1970, Decided

Goldberg v. Kelly, No. 62, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 254; 90 S. Ct. 1011; 25 L. Ed. 2d 287; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 80, October 13, 1969, Argued, March 23, 1970, Decided

Lewis v. Martin, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 902; 90 S. Ct. 902; 25 L. Ed. 2d 84; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 2954, Feb. 24, 1970.

Rosado v. Wyman, No. 1539, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 826; 89 S. Ct. 2134; 23 L. Ed. 2d 739; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1175, June 23, 1969, Decided ** Together with No. 1540, Rosado et al. v. Wyman, Commissioner of Social Services for the State of New York, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Sellers v. Laird, No. 979, Misc., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 950; 89 S. Ct. 2022; 23 L. Ed. 2d 470; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1428, June 9, 1969, Decided

Barbee v. Texas, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 924; 89 S. Ct. 1779; 23 L. Ed. 2d 241; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1550, May 26, 1969.

Wheeler v. Montgomery, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 970; 89 S. Ct. 1452; 22 L. Ed. 2d 751; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1888, Apr. 21, 1969.

Goldberg v. Kelly, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 971; 89 S. Ct. 1469; 22 L. Ed. 2d 751; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1890, Apr. 21, 1969.

Snell v. Wyman, No. 191., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 323; 89 S. Ct. 553; 21 L. Ed. 2d 511; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2872, January 13, 1969, Decided

Wilson v. Kelley, No. 561., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 266; 89 S. Ct. 477; 21 L. Ed. 2d 425; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 6, December 16, 1968, Decided

Lingo v. Georgia, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 992; 89 S. Ct. 467; 21 L. Ed. 2d 455; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 200, Dec. 9, 1968.

King v. Smith, No. 949, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 309; 88 S. Ct. 2128; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1118; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1139, April 23, 1968, Argued, June 17, 1968, Decided

Wynn v. Byrne, No. 977., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 197; 88 S. Ct. 901; 19 L. Ed. 2d 1038; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2286, March 4, 1968, Decided

Davis v. United States, No. 980, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 953; 86 S. Ct. 1567; 16 L. Ed. 2d 549; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1609, May 23, 1966, Decided May 23, 1966.

Jacobellis v. Ohio, No. 11, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 184; 84 S. Ct. 1676; 12 L. Ed. 2d 793; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 822; 28 Ohio Op. 2d 101, March 26, 1963, Argued, June 22, 1964, Decided, Restored to the calendar for reargument April 29, 1963 Reargued April 1, 1964.

Coleman v. Denno, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 1003; 84 S. Ct. 1938; 12 L. Ed. 2d 1052; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 954, Jun. 22, 1964.

Correa v. New York, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 374 U.S. 847; 83 S. Ct. 1907; 10 L. Ed. 2d 1067; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1169, Jun. 17, 1963.

Jacobellis v. Ohio, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 901; 83 S. Ct. 1288; 10 L. Ed. 2d 197; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1701, Argued March 26, 1963., Apr. 29, 1963.

Vincini v. Am. Bldg. Maint. Co., 01-7887, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 41 Fed. Appx. 512; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17759, July 19, 2002, Decided, RULES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.

Katz v. Feinberg, Docket No. 01-7776, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 290 F.3d 95; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9113, April 26, 2002, Argued, May 13, 2002, Decided

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., Docket No. 01-7983, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT , 277 F.3d 253; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 570; 61 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1583; 2002-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73,581, October 10, 2001, Argued, January 14, 2002, Decided, As Amended January 28, 2002. Later proceeding at Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14682 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 6, 2002)

Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, Docket No. 00-9185, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 273 F.3d 429; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25330; 60 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1953; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,345; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,345, May 30, 2001, Finally Submitted, November 28, 2001, Decided, As Amended January 29, 2002.

Parachute Press, Inc. v. Scholastic, Inc., No. 99-7235, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21398; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,155, August 22, 2000, Decided, RULES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT., Reported in Table Case Format at: 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26387.

Speirs v. Scholastic Inc., 99-7274, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28465, October 29, 1999, Decided, RULES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT., Reported in Table Case Format at: 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 36117.

Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., Docket No. 97-7881, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 191 F.3d 98; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20902; 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1691; 76 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P46,176, February 10, 1999, Argued, September 1, 1999, Decided

Michele Pommier Models, Inc. v. Men Women NY Model Mgmt., Inc., 98-9079, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7773, April 15, 1999, Decided, RULES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT., Reported in Table Case Format at: 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13069.

Time Warner Cable v. Bloomberg L.P., Docket Nos. 96-9515, 96-9517, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 118 F.3d 917; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16283, February 19, 1997, Argued, July 3, 1997, Decided

Time Warner Cable v. Bloomberg L.P., Docket Nos. 96-9515, 96-9517, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26237, February 19, 1997, Argued, July 3, 1997, Decided, As Corrected.

Deere & Co. v. MTD Prods., Docket Nos. 94-7799, 94-7863, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 41 F.3d 39; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33042; 32 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1936, October 11, 1994, Argued, November 21, 1994, Decided, As Amended December 6, 1994.

Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Docket No. 92-7197, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 9 F.3d 1033; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30041; 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 351; 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42,685, December 17, 1992, Argued, November 19, 1993, Decided

United States v. Salameh, Docket Nos. 93-1270, 93-1275, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 992 F.2d 445; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10008; 21 Media L. Rep. 1376, April 27, 1993, Argued, April 30, 1993, Decided

Wildmon v. Berwick Universal Pictures, No. 92-7611, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 983 F.2d 21; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35394; 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1388, September 22, 1992, Filed

Arica Inst., Inc. v. Palmer, Docket No. 91-7859, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 970 F.2d 1067; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16694; 23 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1593; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,960, January 30, 1992, Argued, July 22, 1992, Decided

Penguin Books USA, Inc. v. Walsh, No. 91-7131, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 929 F.2d 69; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4941, March 7, 1991, Argued, March 27, 1991, Decided, March 27, 1991, Filed

In re King World Productions, Inc., No. 90-1122, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 898 F.2d 56; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3363; 17 Media L. Rep. 1531, January 29, 1990, Decided, January 29, 1990, Filed

Price v. Viking Penguin, No. 88-5075, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, 881 F.2d 1426; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11441; 16 Media L. Rep. 2169, October 19, 1988, Submitted, August 7, 1989, Filed

Titan Sports, Inc. v. Comics World Corp., No. 88-7734, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 870 F.2d 85; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3232; 10 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1311; 16 Media L. Rep. 1408, December 22, 1988, Argued, March 14, 1989, Decided

Tetra Sales (U.S.A.), Div. of Warner-Lambert Co. v. T.F.H. Publications, Inc., No. 87-7603, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 839 F.2d 881; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1479; 5 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1719, December 9, 1987, Argued, February 3, 1988, Decided

Berni v. International Gourmet Restaurants, Inc., No. 19, Docket 87-7079, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 838 F.2d 642; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1410; 5 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1723, September 18, 1987, Argued, January 29, 1988, Decided

Anastasato v. Commissioner, Nos. 85-5728, 86-5143, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 794 F.2d 884; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26813; 86-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9529; 58 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5349, June 17, 1986, Argued, July 8, 1986, Filed

Marcella v. ARP Films, Inc., Nos. 85-7255, 85-7261, 85-7305, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 778 F.2d 112; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25351, September 19, 1985, Argued, December 3, 1985, Decided

Choudhury v. Polytechnic Inst. of New York, Docket No. 83-7960, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 735 F.2d 38; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22211; 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1572; 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P34,388, April 26, 1984, Argued, May 23, 1984, Decided

Boudin v. Thomas, Nos. 83-2170, 83-2174, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 732 F.2d 1107; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23426, December 16, 1983, Argued, April 17, 1984, Decided, Petition for Rehearing Denied June 16, 1984, Reported at: 737 F.2d 261.

EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 546, Docket 80-6173, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT, 650 F.2d 14; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12862; 25 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1338; 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P31,863, December 15, 1980, Argued, May 27, 1981, Decided

Grove Press, Inc. v. Angleton, Nos. 258, 259, 260, Dockets 80-7436, 7438, 7446, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT, 649 F.2d 121; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13349, December 10, 1980, Argued, May 12, 1981, Decided, Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied September 9, 1981.

Grove Press, Inc. v. CIA,; No. 698, Docket 78-6186, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT, 608 F.2d 926; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11948, March 8, 1979, Argued, September 10, 1979, Decided

Feinstein v. Carey, Docket No. 76-8127 September Term, 1975., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 532 F.2d 873; 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12036, Argued March 31, 1976, April 1, 1976.

Kama Rippa Music, Inc. v. Schekeryk, No. 74-2153, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 510 F.2d 837; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16172, January 6, 1975, Argued, February 10, 1975, Decided

United States v. Berrios, Docket No. 74-1365, No. 1111 - September Term, 1973., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 501 F.2d 1207; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7266; 87 L.R.R.M. 3029; 74 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10,254, June 7, 1974, Argued, August 8, 1974, Decided

1050 Tenants Corp. v. Jakobson, Docket No. 74-1023, No. 1003 - September Term, 1973, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 503 F.2d 1375; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7748; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P94,702, May 22, 1974, Argued, July 8, 1974, Decided

55. Katz v. I.A. Alliance Corp. (In re I. Appel Corp.), 03 Civ. 2355 (VM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 301 B.R. 781; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21488, November 26, 2003, Decided, November 26, 2003, Filed

56. Katz v. I.A. Alliance Corp. (In re I. Appel Corp.), 03 Civ. 2355 (VM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 300 B.R. 564; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18773; 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 14, October 20, 2003, Decided, October 21, 2003, Filed, Subsequent appeal at, Stay denied by Katz v. I.A. Alliance Corp. (In re I. Appel Corp.), 301 B.R. 781, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21488 (S.D.N.Y., 2003) Affirmed by Katz v. I.A. Alliance Corp. (In re I. Appel Corp.), 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13641 (2d Cir. N.Y., July 1, 2004)

57. Loussier v. Universal Music Group, Inc., 02 Civ. 2447 (KMW) (RLE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 258 F. Supp. 2d 308; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6792, April 22, 2003, Decided, April 23, 2003, Filed

58. Loussier v. Universal Music Group, Inc., 02 Civ. 2447 (KMW) (RLE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 214 F.R.D. 174; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6035; 55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 484, April 10, 2003, Decided, April 11, 2003, Filed, Reconsideration denied by Loussier v. Universal Music Group, 258 F. Supp. 2d 308, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6792 (S.D.N.Y., Apr. 22, 2003)

59. About.com, Inc. v. Targetfirst, Inc., 01 cv 1665(GBD) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3385, March 7, 2003, Decided, March 10, 2003, Filed

60. Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 99 Civ. 11480 (AGS) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 246 F. Supp. 2d 355; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2855, February 27, 2003, Decided, February 27, 2003, Filed

61. Stolow v. Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., 02 Civ. 2591 (SAS) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 258 F. Supp. 2d 236; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2248; 2003-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73,967, February 14, 2003, Decided, February 18, 2003, Filed, Affirmed by Stolow v. Greg Manning Auctions, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23408 (2d Cir., Nov. 17, 2003)

62. Feingberg v. Katz, 01 Civ. 2739 (CSH) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1677, February 3, 2003, Decided, February 5, 2003, Filed

63. Lerner v. Forster, 02-CV-1649 (TCP)(WDW) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 240 F. Supp. 2d 233; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 933, January 22, 2003, Decided

64. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., 01 Civ. 3016 (AGS)(HBP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22215, November 7, 2002, Decided, November 15, 2002, Filed

65. Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 99 Civ. 11480 (AGS) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21418, November 5, 2002, Decided, November 6, 2002, Filed

66. Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 99 Civ. 11480 (AGS) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21294; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,531, November 1, 2002, Decided, November 1, 2002, Filed, Application denied by Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21418 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 5, 2002)

67. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Entm't Group, Inc., 01 Civ. 3016 (AGS) (HBP) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19359, October 7, 2002, Decided, October 10, 2002, Filed

68. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., 01 Civ. 3016 (AGS), 01 Civ. 3017 (AGS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 220 F. Supp. 2d 289; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18425; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,508, September 24, 2002, Decided, September 24, 2002, Filed

69. Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 99 Civ. 11480 (AGS) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 221 F. Supp. 2d 425; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17531; 64 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1075; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,506, September 17, 2002, Decided, September 17, 2002, Filed, Reconsideration denied by Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21294 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 1, 2002) Affirmed by Scholastic Inc. v. Stouffer, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24243 (2d Cir., Dec. 2, 2003)

70. Jones v. FCC, 02 CIV. 693 (DLC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16396; 30 Media L. Rep. 2534, September 4, 2002, Decided

71. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., 01 Civ. 3016 (AGS)(HBP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14682, August 6, 2002, Decided, August 8, 2002, Filed

72. Feinberg v. Katz, 99 Civ. 45 (CSH), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13771, July 26, 2002, Decided, July 26, 2002, Filed

73. About.com, Inc. v. Targetfirst, Inc., 01v 1665(GBD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7770, April 26, 2002, Decided, April 30, 2002, Filed, Partial summary judgment granted by, Motion denied by About.com, Inc. v. Targetfirst, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3385 (S.D.N.Y., Mar. 7, 2003)

74. Peden v. Elizabeth Arden Co., 02 Civ. 267 (DC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7158; 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2783, April 23, 2002, Decided, April 23, 2002, Filed

75. In re Louis K. Meisel Gallery, Inc., M18-303, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5948, April 4, 2002, Decided, April 4, 2002, Filed

76. Thayer v. Dial Indus. Sales, Inc., 96 Civ. 0773 (WCC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 189 F. Supp. 2d 81; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3861, March 6, 2002, Decided

77. I. Appel Corp. v. Katz, 99 Civ. 45 (CSH), 00 Civ. 17 (CSH), 01 Civ. 2739 (CSH), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3412, March 1, 2002, Decided, March 1, 2002, Filed

78. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12548, August 17, 2001, Decided

79. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., 01 Civ. 3016 (AGS), 01 Civ. 3017 (AGS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 155 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11568, August 9, 2001, Decided, August 10, 2001, Filed, Affirmed by, in part, Remanded by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters., 277 F.3d 253, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 570 (2d Cir. N.Y., 2002) Related proceeding at General Ins. Co. of Am. v. Marvel Enters., 2004 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 184 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Mar. 9, 2004)

80. Martha Graham Sch. & Dance Found., Inc. v. Martha Graham Ctr. of Contemporary Dance, Inc., 01 Civ. 271 (MGC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 153 F. Supp. 2d 512; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11260, August 7, 2001, Decided, August 8, 2001, Filed

81. About.com, Inc. v. Aptimus, Inc., 01 Civ. 2106 (AGS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6102, May 10, 2001, Decided, May 11, 2001, Filed

82. SunTrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:01-CV-701-CAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION, 136 F. Supp. 2d 1357; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5036; 58 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1652; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,249, April 19, 2001, Decided, April 20, 2001, Filed

83. Starobin v. King, 00-CV-0185, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 137 F. Supp. 2d 93; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4880; 58 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1779; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,259, April 16, 2001, Decided, April 17, 2001, Filed

84. Bell v. Blaze Magazine, 99 CIV 12342 (RCC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2783; 58 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1464; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,241, March 15, 2001, Decided, March 16, 2001, Filed

85. Micare v. Foster & Garbus, 00-CV-0092 (LEK)(DRH), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 132 F. Supp. 2d 77; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1978, February 21, 2001, Decided, February 21, 2001, Filed

86. Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 99 Civ. 11480 (AGS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 124 F. Supp. 2d 836; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17474; 57 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1393; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,191, December 5, 2000, Decided, December 6, 2000, Filed

87. Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11696; 55 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1873; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,122, August 17, 2000, Decided, August 17, 2000, Filed, As Corrected September 7, 2000. Amending Order of August 17, 2001, Reported at: 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12548.

88. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 111 F. Supp. 2d 348; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11948; 55 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1873, August 17, 2000, Decided

89. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 111 F. Supp. 2d 346; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11949, August 17, 2000, Decided

90. Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 99 Civ. 11480 (AGS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11516; 56 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1035, August 14, 2000, Decided, August 14, 2000, Filed

92. Penguin Books U.S.A., Inc. v. New Christian Church of Full Endeavor, Ltd., 96 Civ. 4126 (RWS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10394; 55 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1680; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,130, July 21, 2000, Decided, July 25, 2000, Filed, Motion granted by, in part, Motion denied by, in part Penguin Books U.S.A. v. New Christian Church of Full Endeavor, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7631 (S.D.N.Y., May 7, 2003)

93. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 104 F. Supp. 2d 334; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9936; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,121, July 17, 2000, Decided, July 17, 2000, Filed

94. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12141, June 27, 2000, Decided

95. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12145, June 22, 2000, Decided

96. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11927; 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6647, June 7, 2000, Decided

97. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 00 Civ. 0277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 98 F. Supp. 2d 449; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6970, May 22, 2000, Decided, May 23, 2000, Filed

98. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 00 Civ. 277 (LAK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10621, May 12, 2000, Decided, May 15, 2000, Filed

99. Garden Way, Inc. v. Home Depot, Inc., 00-CV-0357 (LEK/RWS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 94 F. Supp. 2d 276; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5452; 2000-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P72,899, April 18, 2000, Decided, April 18, 2000, Filed

100. Thayer v. Dial Indus. Sales, Inc., 96 Civ. 0773 (WCC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 85 F. Supp. 2d 263; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1880, February 23, 2000, Decided, February 23, 2000, Filed

101. Scholastic Inc. v. Harris, 95 Civ. 176 (AKH), 95 Civ. 989 (AKH), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 80 F. Supp. 2d 139; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19008, December 10, 1999, Decided, December 10, 1999, Filed, As Amended December 27, 1999.

102. NBA Props. v. Untertainment Records LLC, 99 Civ. 2933(HB)(DFE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19019, December 3, 1999, Decided, December 6, 1999, Filed

103. Tall v. Time Is Always Now, Inc., 98 Civ. 8060 (SHS)(HBP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22456, November 22, 1999, Decided, November 23, 1999, Filed

104. Lindsay v. Wrecked & Abandoned Vessel R.M.S. Titanic, 97 Civ. 9248 (HB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15837; 52 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1609; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27,967, October 12, 1999, Decided, October 13, 1999, Filed

105. NBA Props. v. Untertainment Records LLC, 99 Civ. 2933 (HB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7780, May 25, 1999, Decided, May 26, 1999, Filed

106. Scholastic Inc. v. Speirs, 97 Civ. 0163 (MBM), 97 Civ. 0220 (MBM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 28 F. Supp. 2d 862; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18599; 49 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1420; 1999-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P72,494, November 24, 1998, Decided, November 30, 1998, Filed, As Amended December 7, 1998.

107. Lindsay v. Wrecked & Abandoned Vessel R.M.S. Titanic, 97 Civ. 9248 (HB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13604; 1999 AMC 69, September 1, 1998, Decided, September 2, 1998, Filed

108. Lousig-Nont v. Gibson Greetings, No. CIV-F-97-5755 OWW/DLB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19006, August 17, 1998, Decided, August 18, 1998, Filed

109. Lousig-Nont v. Gibson Greetings, CIV-F-97-5755 OWW SMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19005; 48 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1529, August 3, 1998, Decided, August 5, 1998, Filed

110. Michele Pommier Models v. Men Women NY Model Mgmt., 97 Civ. 6837 (SAS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 14 F. Supp. 2d 331; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10132, July 8, 1998, Decided, July 8, 1998, Filed

111. Duffy v. Penguin Books USA, 96 Civ. 9077 (BDP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 4 F. Supp. 2d 268; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4455; 47 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1135; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27,952, April 2, 1998, Decided, April 2, 1998, Opinion Filed

112. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Suarez Corp., 98 Civ. 1711 (WK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3487; 46 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1312, March 19, 1998, Decided, March 19, 1998, Filed

113. Michele Pommier Models v. Men Women NY Model Mgmt., 97 Civ. 6837 (SAS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18294, November 17, 1997, Decided, November 18, 1997, Filed

114. Penguin Books U.S.A., Inc. v. New Christian Church of Full Endeavor, Ltd., (RWS 96 Civ. 4126), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4301, April 7, 1997, Decided, April 8, 1997, FILED

115. Jaisinghani v. Capital Cities/ABC, Case No. 94-1927-CIV-NESBITT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, 973 F. Supp. 1450; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5745; 25 Media L. Rep. 1888; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 576, March 22, 1997, Decided, March 26, 1997, FILED

116. Penguin Books U.S.A., Inc. v. New Christian Church of Full Endeavor, Ltd., (RWS 96 Civ. 4126), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 567, January 22, 1997, Decided, January 24, 1997, FILED

117. Time Warner Cable v. City of New York, 96 CIV. 7736 (DLC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 943 F. Supp. 1357; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16479, November 6, 1996, Decided, November 6, 1996, FILED

118. Geary v. Goldstein, 91 Civ. 6222 (KMW), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11288, August 7, 1996, Decided, August 8, 1996, FILED

119. Esquivel v. Arau, No. CV 95-6551 WJR (Mcx), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 913 F. Supp. 1382; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 853; 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 769; 96 Daily Journal DAR 4569, January 26, 1996, DATED, January 26, 1996, FILED

120. Commodore Business Machs. v. Montgomery Grant Inc., 90 Civ. 7498 (LMM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19288, December 29, 1995, Dated, December 29, 1995, FILED

121. American Booksellers Ass'n v. Houghton Mifflin Co., No. 94 CIV 8566 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21035; 1995-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P71,217, October 30, 1995, Decided, October 31, 1995, FILED

122. Commodore Business Machs. v. Montgomery Grant, 90 Civ. 7498 (LMM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13695; 1995-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P71,143, September 5, 1995, Decided, September 21, 1995, FILED

123. Frank v. Coldwell Banker Schlott, 94 Civ. 8181 (MGC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11556, August 11, 1995, Decided, August 14, 1995, FILED

124. Berman v. Turecki, 94 Civ. 5127 (PKL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 885 F. Supp. 528; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5953, May 4, 1995, Decided, May 5, 1995, FILED

125. American Booksellers Ass'n v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 94 Civ. 8566 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2522; 1995-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P70,931, March 3, 1995, Decided, March 3, 1995, FILED

126. Deere & Co. v. MTD Prods., 94 CIV. 2322 (DLC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2278; 34 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1706, February 27, 1995, Decided, February 28, 1995, FILED

127. Reuters Television v. CEL Communications, 94 Civ. 1111 (RPP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 269; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27,366, January 12, 1995, Decided, January 13, 1995, FILED

128. Deere & Co. v. MTD Prods., 94 Civ. 2322 (LMM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 860 F. Supp. 113; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19510, August 11, 1994, Decided, Reported at: 860 F. Supp. 113 at 123.

129. Reuters Television v. CEL Communications, 94 Civ. 1111 (RPP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10744; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27,316, August 3, 1994, Decided, August 4, 1994, Filed

130. Gifford v. National Enquirer, Inc., CASE NO. CV 93-3655 LGB (Tx), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21329; 23 Media L. Rep. 1016, December 7, 1993, Decided, December 7, 1993, Filed; December 10, 1993, Entered

131. Arrow Trading Co. v. Suarez Corp., 89 Civ. 8496 (LAP) consolidated with 91 Civ. 6684 (LAP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12056, August 25, 1993, Decided, August 31, 1993, Filed

132. Busana Idaman Nurani v. Marissa by GHR Indus. Trading Corp., 88 Civ. 7370 (DNE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 151 F.R.D. 32; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11699, August 23, 1993, Decided, August 23, 1993, Filed

133. Levine v. Angus, 92 Civ. 2210 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8465, June 22, 1993, Decided, June 22, 1993, Filed

134. Wildmon v. Berwick Universal Pictures, Civil Action No. EC 91-320-D-G, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI, EASTERN DIVISION, 803 F. Supp. 1167; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14383; 20 Media L. Rep. 1851, September 8, 1992, Decided, September 8, 1992, Filed

135. Arica Inst., Inc. v. Palmer, No. 90 Civ. 5153 (RPP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 770 F. Supp. 188; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10779; 19 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1755; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,770, August 5, 1991, Decided, August 6, 1991, Filed

136. Arica Inst., Inc. v. Palmer, No. 90 Civ. 5153 (RPP), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 761 F. Supp. 1056; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4731; 18 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 2013; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,712, April 9, 1991, Decided, April 10, 1991, Filed

137. Penguin Books USA, Inc. v. Walsh, No. 90 Civ. 7636 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 756 F. Supp. 770; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 962; 18 Media L. Rep. 1857, January 31, 1991, Decided

139. Jim Crockett Promotions, Inc. v. Action Media Group, Inc., No. C-C-90-220-P, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHARLOTTE DIVISION, 751 F. Supp. 93; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15723, November 16, 1990, Decided, November 19, 1990, Filed

140. Berger v. King World Productions, Inc., Case No. 90-CV-70109-DT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 732 F. Supp. 766; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3206; 17 Media L. Rep. 1876, March 21, 1990, Decided

141. Tetra Sales (U.S.A.), Div. of Warner-Lambert Co. v. T.F.H. Publications, Inc., Civil Action No. 87 Civ. 0922 (PKL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 727 F. Supp. 92; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12860, October 31, 1989, Decided, October 31, 1989, Filed

142. Dames v. Gimbel, No. 88 Civ. 3692 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8297, July 12, 1989, Decided

143. Sound Video Unlimited, Inc. v. Video Shack, Inc., No. 83 Civ. 5853 (GLG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 700 F. Supp. 127; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12567, November 9, 1988, Decided

144. Cheever v. Academy Chicago, Ltd., No. 88 Civ. 3404 (GLG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 690 F. Supp. 281; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8515; 7 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1699; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,333; 15 Media L. Rep. 1809, August 2, 1988, Decided

145. Titan Sports, Inc. v. Comics World Corp., No. 87 CIV. 0178 (PKL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 690 F. Supp. 1315; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6992, July 13, 1988, Decided, Reversed and Remanded, March 14, 1989, Reported at: 870 F.2d 85.

146. Cheever v. Academy Chicago, Ltd., No. 88 Civ. 3404 (GLG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 685 F. Supp. 914; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5461; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,309, June 9, 1988, Decided

147. Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., Civil No. 4-85-819, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, FOURTH DIVISION, 676 F. Supp. 1501; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 334, January 13, 1988, Decided

148. Rosenthal v. Kingsley, No. 85 CIV. 0945 (PKL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 674 F. Supp. 1113; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11729, December 11, 1987, Decided, December 18, 1987, Filed

149. Craft v. Kobler, No. 87 Civ. 2601 (PNL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 667 F. Supp. 120; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7040; 4 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1064; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,147; 14 Media L. Rep. 1617, August 6, 1987, Decided, August 6, 1987, Filed, As Amended, August 7, 1987.

150. Citadel Theatre v. Maw Canadian Corp., No. 85 Civ. 9711 (MGC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2957, April 15, 1987, Decided; April 17, 1987, Filed

151. Price v. Viking Press, Inc., Civ. No. 4-85-819, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, FOURTH DIVISION, 654 F. Supp. 1038; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1359, February 19, 1987, Decided, February 20, 1987, Filed

152. Price v. Viking Press, Inc., No. Civ. 4-85-819, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, FOURTH DIVISION, 113 F.R.D. 585; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16526; 13 Media L. Rep. 1906, December 12, 1986, Decided

153. Lerner v. United States, No. 85 Civ. 6091 (CHT), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 637 F. Supp. 679; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24631; 87-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9339; 58 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5610, June 4, 1986

154. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc., 86 Civ. 3194 (RLC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24963; 12 Media L. Rep. 2326, May 28, 1986

155. Price v. Viking Press, Inc., No. 4-85-819, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, FOURTH DIVISION, 625 F. Supp. 641; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12227; 12 Media L. Rep. 1689, December 30, 1985

156. Towle Mfg. Co. v. Godinger Silver Art Co., No. 85 CIV 3153 (LBS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 612 F. Supp. 986; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18282; 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 599; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P25,813, July 2, 1985

157. Allen v. National Video, Inc., No. 84 Civ. 2764 (CBM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 610 F. Supp. 612; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19767; 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 483, May 16, 1985

158. In re Brentano's, Inc., No. 83 Civ. 2118 (JES), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 36 B.R. 90; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20281, January 19, 1984

159. SHALSON v. AVANTE-GARDE MEDIA, No. 77 Civ. 3164 (MJL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20631, January 9, 1984

160. RICE v. BIRARDI, No. 81-CV-1057, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12685, October 17, 1983

161. Viking Penguin, Inc. v. Janklow, No. 83 Civ. 4025, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 98 F.R.D. 763; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14376; 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 708; 9 Media L. Rep. 2219, August 24, 1983

162. S.S. Enterprises v. India Sari Palace, Inc., No. 82 Civ. 7937 (RWS)., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York., 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17956; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P25,527, April 5, 1983

163. Astronics Corp. v. Protective Closures Co., No. CIV-83-13C, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 561 F. Supp. 329; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17997; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P99,176, April 4, 1983

164. Boudin v. Thomas, No. 81 Civ. 7190 (KTD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 559 F. Supp. 521; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18372, March 22, 1983

165. Boudin v. Thomas, No. 81 Civ. 7190 (KTD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 554 F. Supp. 703; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16781; 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 366, December 13, 1982

166. ROCHE PRODS. v. PUBLIC CITIZEN HEALTH RESEARCH GROUP, No. 82 Civ. 2754 (MEL), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13528, June 16, 1982

167. Boudin v. Thomas, No. 81 Civ. 7190 (KTD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 543 F. Supp. 686; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13495, June 14, 1982

168. Boudin v. Thomas, No. 81 Civ. 7190 (KTD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 533 F. Supp. 786; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10614, January 7, 1982

169. Kinstler v. Saturday Evening Post Co., No. 80 Civ. 1964, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 507 F. Supp. 113; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10561; 212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 596, February 4, 1981, As Amended February 23, 1981.

170. EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 79 Civ. 5708 (KTD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11989; 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 43; 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P31,065, June 16, 1980

171. Grove Press, Inc. v. Central Intelligence Agency, No. 76 Civ. 5509 (VLB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 483 F. Supp. 132; 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9856, January 15, 1980

172. GROVE PRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES DOJ, 75 Civ. 6204 (GLG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11715, Jun. 14, 1979

173. FILMS & PROPERTIES ETABLISSEMENT v. ALLIED ARTISTS PICTURES CORP., 78 Civ. 278, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16892, Jun. 29, 1978

174. GROVE PRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES DOD, 75 CIV. 6206., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19699, Feb. 6, 1978

175. Voisin v. Bartell Media Corp., 76 Civ. 3954, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20284; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P96,296, Jan. 9, 1978

176. Katz v. First Nat'l Bank, No. 73 C 1051, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 424 F. Supp. 1174; 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12709, October 19, 1976

177. Isley v. Motown Record Corp., No. 69 Civ. 2556, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 69 F.R.D. 12; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15238, November 18, 1975

178. Rare Earth, Inc. v. Hoorelbeke, No. 74 Civ. 3402 (JMC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 401 F. Supp. 26; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11455; 187 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 291; 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 503, July 15, 1975

179. Rosado v. Wyman, No. 69 Civ. 355, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 304 F. Supp. 1354; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10260, May 12, 1969

180. National Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, No. 69 Civ. 355, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 304 F. Supp. 1346; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10259; 13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 529, April 23, 1969

181. Catalano v. Department of Hospitals, No. 68 Civ. 3014, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 299 F. Supp. 166; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9464, April 8, 1969

182. Kelly v. Wyman, Nos. 68 Civ. 394, 864, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 294 F. Supp. 893; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10189, November 26, 1968, Probable Jurisdiction Noted April 21, 1969.

183. Kelly v. Wyman, Nos. 68 Civ. 394, 864, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 294 F. Supp. 887; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12576, May 17, 1968

184. Anderson v. Burson, Civ. A. Nos. 10443, 10882, 10991, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION, 300 F. Supp. 401; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7710, April 5, 1968

185. Snell v. Wyman, No. 67 Civ. 2676, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 281 F. Supp. 853; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12401, February 29, 1968

186. Smith v. King, Civ. A. No. 2495-N, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION, 277 F. Supp. 31; 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7808, November 8, 1967, Probable Jurisdiction Noted January 22, 1968. Reported at: 390 U.S. 903.

187. G. P. Putnam's Sons v. Lancer Books, Inc., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 251 F. Supp. 210; 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10317; 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 368; 148 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 596, February 25, 1966

188. Coleman v. Denno, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 223 F. Supp. 938; 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6543, November 7, 1963

189. In re Strotz, No. 37302-M, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL DIVISION, 61 F. Supp. 565; 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1544, June 28, 1944

190. Polansky, No. 367-75, United States Court of Claims, 210 Ct. Cl. 737; 546 F.2d 429; 1976 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55, JUNE 25, 1976

191. In re 611 Sixth Ave. Corp., Chapter 11, Case No.: 95 B 43395 (SMB), UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 191 B.R. 295; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 72; 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 621, January 26, 1996, Dated

192. In re Brentano's, Inc., No. 82 B 10955, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 27 B.R. 90; 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6923; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P69,079; 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 157, January 31, 1983

201. Academy Chicago Publishers v. Cheever, No. 70587, Supreme Court of Illinois, 144 Ill. 2d 24; 578 N.E.2d 981; 1991 Ill. LEXIS 47; 161 Ill. Dec. 335; 18 Media L. Rep. 2327, June 20, 1991, Filed, Rehearing Denied September 30, 1991. As Corrected July 11, 1991.

202. Academy Chicago Publishers v. Cheever, No. 1-89-0506, Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division, 200 Ill. App. 3d 677; 558 N.E.2d 349; 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 933; 146 Ill. Dec. 386, June 27, 1990, Filed

204. Springer v. Viking Press, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 916; 458 N.E.2d 1256; 470 N.Y.S.2d 579; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3558; 9 Media L. Rep. 2560, October 26, 1983, Argued, November 23, 1983, Decided

205. Rinaldi v. Viking Penguin, Inc., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 52 N.Y.2d 422; 420 N.E.2d 377; 438 N.Y.S.2d 496; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2266; 7 Media L. Rep. 1202, January 7, 1981, Argued, April 7, 1981, Decided

206. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Steingut, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 250; 353 N.E.2d 558; 386 N.Y.S.2d 646; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2883, June 2, 1976, Argued, June 17, 1976, Decided

207. People v. Correa, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 26 N.Y.2d 786; 257 N.E.2d 660; 309 N.Y.S.2d 216; 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1524, January 22, 1970, Submitted, February 19, 1970, Decided

208. Starr v. De Rocco, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 24 N.Y.2d 1011; 250 N.E.2d 240; 302 N.Y.S.2d 835; 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1241, April 7, 1969, Argued, May 28, 1969, Decided

209. People v. Pickett, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 19 N.Y.2d 170; 225 N.E.2d 509; 278 N.Y.S.2d 802; 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1704, January 16, 1967, Argued, February 23, 1967, Decided

210. People v. Cobert, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 15 N.Y.2d 1020; 207 N.E.2d 619; 260 N.Y.S.2d 27; 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1469, March 17, 1965, Argued, April 15, 1965, Decided

211. Connection Co. v. Regents of University, COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK, 12 N.Y.2d 779; 186 N.E.2d 569; 234 N.Y.S.2d 722; 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 903, Argued October 23, 1962, November 1, 1962. - Decided

212. Taylor v. Muss, COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK, 11 N.Y.2d 685; 180 N.E.2d 912; 225 N.Y.S.2d 759; 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1421, Argued January 9, 1962, January 25, 1962. - Decided

220. Martin v. Briggs, 61093, 61094, 61095, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 235 A.D.2d 192; 663 N.Y.S.2d 184; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10789, October 28, 1997, Decided, October 28, 1997, Entered

221. White Light Prods. v. On the Scene Prods., 60883, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 231 A.D.2d 90; 660 N.Y.S.2d 568; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7426, July 17, 1997, Decided, July 17, 1997, ENTERED

223. Rodriguez v. New York, 47651, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 189 A.D.2d 166; 595 N.Y.S.2d 421; 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2851, March 25, 1993, Decided, March 25, 1993, Entered

224. Campfield v. Perales, No. 41837, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 169 A.D.2d 267; 573 N.Y.S.2d 80; 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9545, July 11, 1991

225. Denicker v. Denicker, No. 2236E, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department, 173 A.D.2d 516; 570 N.Y.S.2d 118; 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8266, April 9, 1991, Argued, May 13, 1991

226. People v. Boudin, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department, 90 A.D.2d 253; 457 N.Y.S.2d 302; 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18834, December 15, 1982

227. Springer v. Viking Press, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 90 A.D.2d 315; 457 N.Y.S.2d 246; 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18842; 8 Media L. Rep. 2613, December 14, 1982

228. People v. Boudin, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department, 87 A.D.2d 133; 451 N.Y.S.2d 153; 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16122, June 1, 1982

229. Rinaldi v. Viking Penguin, Inc., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 73 A.D.2d 43; 425 N.Y.S.2d 101; 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9715; 5 Media L. Rep. 2506, February 26, 1980

230. Onondaga Sav. Bank v. Cale Development Co., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, 63 A.D.2d 415; 407 N.Y.S.2d 95; 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11357, July 13, 1978

231. Civil Service Employees Asso. v. Levitt, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department, 52 A.D.2d 100; 383 N.Y.S.2d 88; 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11537, May 11, 1976

232. Taylor v. Muss, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 13 A.D.2d 245; 216 N.Y.S.2d 249; 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10362, June 6, 1961

235. Wyndham Co. v. Wyndham Hotel Co., INDEX NO. 17474/92, CAL. NO. 96E00023, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, 176 Misc. 2d 116; 670 N.Y.S.2d 995; 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 684, December 31, 1997, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION

236. Doe v. Daily News, L.P., Index No. 119461/94, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, 173 Misc. 2d 321; 660 N.Y.S.2d 604; 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 266, February 5, 1997, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION

237. Doe v. Daily News, L.P., Index No. 119461/94, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, 167 Misc. 2d 1; 632 N.Y.S.2d 750; 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 472, August 1, 1995, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION

238. Goetz v. Kunstler, Index No. 128210/94, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, 164 Misc. 2d 557; 625 N.Y.S.2d 447; 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 118, March 14, 1995, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION

240. Wyndham Co. v. Wyndham Hotel Co., Index No. 17474/92, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY, 157 Misc. 2d 307; 596 N.Y.S.2d 655; 1992 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 656, November 27, 1992, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION

242. Marcinkus v. NAL Pub., Inc., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, New York County, 138 Misc. 2d 256; 522 N.Y.S.2d 1009; 1987 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2794; 14 Media L. Rep. 2094, December 3, 1987

243. People v. Kaminsky, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Criminal Term, New York County, 127 Misc. 2d 497; 486 N.Y.S.2d 814; 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2624, January 18, 1985

244. People v. Boudin, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Rockland County, 118 Misc. 2d 230; 460 N.Y.S.2d 879; 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3298, March 11, 1983

245. People v. Boudin, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Rockland County, 117 Misc. 2d 518; 458 N.Y.S.2d 845; 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3180, January 13, 1983

246. People v. Life Science Church, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Trial Term, New York County, 113 Misc. 2d 952; 450 N.Y.S.2d 664; 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3406; 82-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9414, April 27, 1982

247. People v. Boudin, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Rockland County, 114 Misc. 2d 523; 452 N.Y.S.2d 496; 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3509, April 19, 1982

248. People v. Tobler, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Criminal Term, Suffolk County, 91 Misc. 2d 69; 397 N.Y.S.2d 325; 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2238, July 19, 1977

249. Barrett v. State, Motion No. M-17855, Court of Claims of New York, 85 Misc. 2d 456; 378 N.Y.S.2d 946; 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2017, January 9, 1976

250. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Steingut, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, Albany County, 84 Misc. 2d 1012; 378 N.Y.S.2d 226; 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3253, December 30, 1975

251. Current Audio, Inc. v. RCA Corp., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, New York County, 71 Misc. 2d 831; 337 N.Y.S.2d 949; 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1674; 176 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 271, August 1, 1972

252. Petition of Weitzner, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, New York County, 66 Misc. 2d 721; 321 N.Y.S.2d 925; 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1606, May 25, 1971

253. Spiegelman v. Engineers Country Club, Inc., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, Nassau County, 64 Misc. 2d 747; 316 N.Y.S.2d 358; 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1091, December 7, 1970

254. Board of Higher Education v. Students for A Democratic Soc., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, Queens County, 60 Misc. 2d 114; 300 N.Y.S.2d 983; 1969 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1463, June 9, 1969

255. People v. Newsome, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Trial Term, Bronx County, 52 Misc. 2d 178; 274 N.Y.S.2d 652; 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1345, November 7, 1966

256. Helpern v. McMorran, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, New York County, 50 Misc. 2d 134; 270 N.Y.S.2d 656; 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1332, November 18, 1965

260. Janklow v. Viking Press, No. 16778, Supreme Court of South Dakota, 459 N.W.2d 415; 1990 S.D. LEXIS 104; 17 Media L. Rep. 2220, March 19, 1990, Argued, July 18, 1990, Filed

261. Janklow v. Viking Press, No. 14657, Supreme Court of South Dakota, 378 N.W.2d 875; 1985 S.D. LEXIS 387; 12 Media L. Rep. 1539, January 9, 1985, Argued, December 11, 1985, Rehearing Denied January 15, 1986.

REFERENCES

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martin_Garbus&oldid=186361748"