User talk:Loodog

; Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2; Archive 3;

Okay, I didn't know that. Why would you use outdated numbers though? —Preceding unsigned comment added by XxTrillvillexX9 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atlanta

Thank you for your help tagging questionable statements in Atlanta. You specified on your most recent edit that: "this is NOT an exhaustive tagging". An exhaustive tagging would be appreciated, if you have the time. I would like to see Atlanta resubmitted for GA status. Your feedback is valuable, especially considering your contributions to other city articles.
Thanks again,
--JKeene 05:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of approved and under construction skyscapers in Downtown Phoenix

List of approved and under construction skyscapers in Downtown Phoenix, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of approved and under construction skyscapers in Downtown Phoenix satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of approved and under construction skyscapers in Downtown Phoenix and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of approved and under construction skyscapers in Downtown Phoenix during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kwsn (Ni!) 23:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Popular music artists from Atlanta

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Popular music artists from Atlanta, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Popular music artists from Atlanta. Coppertwig 00:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?...

The residents of Billings eventually drove out the "evil satanist activists who would so swiftly force patriotic Americans into ascerbic fear"

Thanks

--Wolfdog1 (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a reductio ad absurdum.--Loodog (talk) 02:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DART

No problem, give a week or two and I can get it done. FoUTASportscaster (talk) 02:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UTA TRAX

Don't worry, I do to plan to write that section eventually, I'm just not quite sure how to go about writing it, and it's not on the top of my priority list at the moment. But I will write it, as that page has the potential to be very informative and well-written, and I hope to contribute to that. bob rulz (talk) 09:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

Sure thing. I'll get to it very soon. Thanks! XxTrillvillexX9 (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this worth working on

Or will it get nuked you think? TIA --Tom 16:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. I didn't know he had a story. Though I'm pretty sure that article will eventually get removed as nonnotable.--Loodog (talk) 02:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Centers of Commerce

Hey,

I noticed that you had voted for the deletion of the International Centers of Commerce template because you felt it was an advertisement. I just want to let you know that I have changed the text so that the template does not appear like an advertisement, but rather an informational template to tell people about the top 10 centers of financial flow. The template now does not show "Mastercard Worldwide" on it, but rather says source. I hope you will change your mind and your vote on the Templates for deletion: International Centers of Commerce

Thanks, Nikkul (talk) 04:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bostonecon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bostonecon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 18:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC) Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 18:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kardashev Scale

Hi, recently the Kardashev scale entry has gone through some major reverts, I'd like to talk about the reinstatement of the material. I've looked around and have seen that you've made some major contributions to the article and are interested in it's progress. I feel we need to talk about the reverts and reinstatement and talk about whether either are justified. Talk:Kardashev scale If you could help or add your two cents I'd really appreciate it. Thanks--Sparkygravity (talk) 01:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Familyguyskyline.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Familyguyskyline.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peak oil & "New urbanism"

Hi, first off, I just noticed new urbanism today. I'm wondering about the section you deleted from peak oil: is your only issue with it that it mentions new urbanism? I tried to soften the statement about that "movement", and I don't think it's a plug (though maybe it belongs in the peak oil mitigation section more than the main article). I believe thre rest of the section is based on the writtings of James Howard Kunstler and others, so it's hardly OR. I do think some discussion of suburbs could go there (as I'm sure do those who wrote the section), so care to help flesh out what you would consider acceptable? NJGW (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there had been a single source in that section making the point it makes, I would have had no problem with it. But as it stands, it reeks of "I told ya so" from the Smart Growthers and New Urbanists, promising energy-profligate suburbs to be "slums of the future". Speaking of which, what is this quoting? There's no source saying it. There's also no guarantee a lack of oil, out of all energy sources, will strand our suburbanites.--Loodog (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So if I cite one source from Kunstler you'd be satisfied that the section can stay? NJGW (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As much of the section as appears in the source.--Loodog (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And do you consider any mention of "new urbanism" to be a plug? In my opinion that's a bit extreme, as any mention of mitigation forms (as in hybrids, wind energy etc.) would be plugs by the same rational. NJGW (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mostly see it as a plug because of the lack of sources, but also because the availability of one energy source is, at best, peripherally related to housing patterns.--Loodog (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added references to Kunstler's book on the subject, as well as a video lecture he gave at TED 2004. I also added other forms of mitigation so it doesn't seem like a plug for "new urbanism". I've moved this conversation to the Peak oil talk page. NJGW (talk) 18:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rhode Island International Film Festival

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rhode Island International Film Festival, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Rhode Island International Film Festival. Jfire (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting down Rhode Island Intro

Hey, not that I don't agree that the intro could use a little shortening, I'd just prefer it if you moved information from the intro to other applicable areas rather than deleting them outright. Namely, the fact that Rhode Island is the smallest state by geographic size and population, as well as the state with the longest official name, strikes me as something that should be kept in the article. If you could redo your revision so that information is displaced, not lost, that'd be great. Thanks. -CitrusFreak12 (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF???

I just recieved a message from you about making inappropriate edits. I haven't made any edits what so ever to the page you said i had so i don't understand???

The edits in question were these.--Loodog (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Student Village (Victoria University)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Student Village (Victoria University), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Student Village. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Student Village (Victoria University), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6 Housekeeping. This article must be deleted to make room for a clean page move.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-and-paste page moves

The rationale you gave for contesting the speedy deletion of Student Village (Victoria University) is the exact reason why it SHOULD be deleted. The page was not moved. It was copied and pasted. You transferred the text, but not the edit history that comes with it. It needs to be moved. Please refrain from editing either page until the page you created is deleted, and Student Village moved to Student Village (Victoria University) as you intended to do. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I see what you mean.--Loodog (talk) 01:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images tagged for deletion

I just wanted to let you know that I tagged three non-free images that you uploaded, Image:Waterplacetower.jpg, Image:Westinres.JPG, and Image:Waterplacecondos.JPG for speedy deletion per CSD1, as the Residences at the Westin is now complete and the Waterplace Towers are very near completion. I went out and took a few photos of the buildings, and uploaded two, Image:Waterplace Providence.JPG and Image:Residences Westin Providence.JPG, to use in place of the non-free ones. I apologize for the poor image quality... I will try and get some better ones to upload soon. Cheers, Rai-me 04:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

K. Good work.--Loodog (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baby

Dude I just looked at ClayMort's page and I must say. He is a baby. He acts like a childish four year old and hes an idiot! Quahog in Kent! What an idiot! You should have rubbed it in his face that you can see the Providence Skyline from the Griffins house!Crips r us (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you live in Rhode Island? I live in Providence.Crips r us (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

!!!!!!!!

YOU DO! You do live in Rhode Island! Cool! Hey what part?Crips r us (talk) 22:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question2

Could you tell me about the RI Film Festival? I tried but I really didn't get it.